TSTP Solution File: CAT017-3 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : CAT017-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:06:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 1.03s
% Output : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : CAT017-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 29 20:43:09 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.47/1.03 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.47/1.03 Process 6976 was started by sandbox2 on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.47/1.03 Sun May 29 20:43:10 2022
% 0.47/1.03 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_6823_n026.cluster.edu".
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_6823_n026.cluster.edu
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.47/1.03 set(auto2).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.47/1.03 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.47/1.03 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.47/1.03 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.47/1.03 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.47/1.03 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.47/1.03 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.47/1.03 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.47/1.03 clear(print_given).
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (19 formulas)
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.47/1.03 1 -there_exists(A) | A != B | equivalent(A,B) # label(existence_and_equality_implies_equivalence1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.47/1.03 2 -equivalent(A,B) | there_exists(A) # label(equivalence_implies_existence1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.47/1.03 3 -equivalent(A,B) | there_exists(B) # label(equivalence_implies_existence3) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.47/1.03 4 -equivalent(A,B) | A = B # label(equivalence_implies_existence2) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.47/1.03 Derived: -there_exists(A) | A != B | there_exists(B). [resolve(1,c,3,a)].
% 0.47/1.03 5 -there_exists(A) | -there_exists(B) | A != B | equivalent(A,B) # label(existence_and_equality_implies_equivalence2) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.47/1.03 Function symbol KB weights: a=1. compose=1. f1=1. domain=1. codomain=1.
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.47/1.03 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.47/1.03 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.47/1.03 % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.47/1.03 % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.47/1.03 % Maximum clause weight is 7.000.
% 0.47/1.03 % Given clauses 19.
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 1 -there_exists(A) | A != B | equivalent(A,B) # label(existence_and_equality_implies_equivalence1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.47/1.03 3 -equivalent(A,B) | there_exists(B) # label(equivalence_implies_existence3) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.47/1.03 6 there_exists(a) # label(assume_a_exists) # label(hypothesis). [assumption].
% 0.47/1.03 7 compose(A,domain(A)) = A # label(compose_domain) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.47/1.03 14 -there_exists(codomain(a)) # label(prove_codomain_of_a_exists) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.47/1.03 18 -there_exists(compose(A,B)) | there_exists(codomain(A)) # label(composition_implies_codomain) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.47/1.03 25 -there_exists(A) | A != B | there_exists(B). [resolve(1,c,3,a)].
% 0.47/1.03 36 -there_exists(compose(a,A)). [ur(18,b,14,a)].
% 0.47/1.03 57 $F. [ur(25,b,7,a(flip),c,36,a),unit_del(a,6)].
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 Given=19. Generated=103. Kept=46. proofs=1.
% 0.47/1.03 Usable=19. Sos=27. Demods=8. Limbo=0, Disabled=20. Hints=0.
% 0.47/1.03 Megabytes=0.07.
% 0.47/1.03 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.47/1.03 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.47/1.03
% 0.47/1.03 Process 6976 exit (max_proofs) Sun May 29 20:43:10 2022
% 0.47/1.03 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------