TSTP Solution File: CAT010-4 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : CAT010-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:09:03 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.44s 1.13s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
there_exists(compose(a,b)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ab_exists) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
codomain(compose(a,b)) != codomain(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_codomain_of_ab_equals_codomain_of_a) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
( ~ there_exists(domain(X0))
| there_exists(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT004-0.ax',domain_has_elements) ).
cnf(c_56,plain,
( ~ there_exists(compose(X0,X1))
| there_exists(domain(X0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT004-0.ax',composition_implies_domain) ).
cnf(c_57,plain,
( ~ there_exists(compose(X0,X1))
| codomain(X1) = domain(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT004-0.ax',domain_codomain_composition1) ).
cnf(c_59,plain,
compose(compose(X0,X1),X2) = compose(X0,compose(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT004-0.ax',associativity_of_compose) ).
cnf(c_61,plain,
compose(codomain(X0),X0) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT004-0.ax',compose_codomain) ).
cnf(c_64,plain,
( ~ there_exists(domain(a))
| there_exists(a) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_54]) ).
cnf(c_218,plain,
compose(a,b) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_219,plain,
codomain(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_220,plain,
codomain(a) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_221,negated_conjecture,
sP1_iProver_def != sP2_iProver_def,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_220,c_218,c_219]) ).
cnf(c_358,plain,
there_exists(sP0_iProver_def),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_218]) ).
cnf(c_383,plain,
compose(sP2_iProver_def,a) = a,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_220,c_61]) ).
cnf(c_391,plain,
( ~ there_exists(sP0_iProver_def)
| there_exists(domain(a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_218,c_56]) ).
cnf(c_397,plain,
there_exists(domain(a)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_391,c_358]) ).
cnf(c_427,plain,
( ~ there_exists(a)
| codomain(a) = domain(sP2_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_383,c_57]) ).
cnf(c_429,plain,
compose(sP2_iProver_def,compose(a,X0)) = compose(a,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_383,c_59]) ).
cnf(c_432,plain,
( ~ there_exists(a)
| domain(sP2_iProver_def) = sP2_iProver_def ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_427,c_220]) ).
cnf(c_611,plain,
domain(sP2_iProver_def) = sP2_iProver_def,
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_432,c_64,c_397,c_432]) ).
cnf(c_787,plain,
compose(sP2_iProver_def,sP0_iProver_def) = sP0_iProver_def,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_218,c_429]) ).
cnf(c_805,plain,
( ~ there_exists(sP0_iProver_def)
| codomain(sP0_iProver_def) = domain(sP2_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_787,c_57]) ).
cnf(c_809,plain,
( ~ there_exists(sP0_iProver_def)
| sP1_iProver_def = sP2_iProver_def ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_805,c_219,c_611]) ).
cnf(c_810,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_809,c_221,c_358]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : CAT010-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.11 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Thu May 2 20:45:36 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.44/1.13 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/1.13 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13 ------ iProver source info
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.44/1.13 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.44/1.13 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13 ------ Parsing...successful
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.44/1.13 ------ Proving...
% 0.44/1.13 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13 clauses 13
% 0.44/1.13 conjectures 1
% 0.44/1.13 EPR 1
% 0.44/1.13 Horn 13
% 0.44/1.13 unary 8
% 0.44/1.13 binary 4
% 0.44/1.13 lits 19
% 0.44/1.13 lits eq 9
% 0.44/1.13 fd_pure 0
% 0.44/1.13 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.44/1.13 fd_cond 0
% 0.44/1.13 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 0.44/1.13 AC symbols 0
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13 ------
% 0.44/1.13 Current options:
% 0.44/1.13 ------
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13 ------ Proving...
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.44/1.13
% 0.44/1.13
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------