TSTP Solution File: CAT009-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : CAT009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:34:37 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 5.90s 2.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  10 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   75 (  39   ~;  36   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (   6   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (;  52   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ product > defined > identity_map > compose > #nlpp > domain > codomain > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(product,type,
    product: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(domain,type,
    domain: $i > $i ).

tff(defined,type,
    defined: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(identity_map,type,
    identity_map: $i > $o ).

tff(codomain,type,
    codomain: $i > $i ).

tff(compose,type,
    compose: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_171,axiom,
    defined(b,a),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_132,axiom,
    ! [X] : identity_map(domain(X)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_51,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ defined(X,Y)
      | product(X,Y,compose(X,Y)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_136,axiom,
    ! [X] : defined(X,domain(X)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_65,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Xy,Z] :
      ( ~ product(X,Y,Xy)
      | ~ defined(Xy,Z)
      | defined(Y,Z) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_159,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ defined(X,Y)
      | ~ identity_map(Y)
      | product(X,Y,X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_151,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ defined(X,Y)
      | ~ identity_map(X)
      | product(X,Y,Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_168,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z,W] :
      ( ~ product(X,Y,Z)
      | ~ product(X,Y,W)
      | ( Z = W ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_173,axiom,
    domain(compose(b,a)) != domain(a),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    defined(b,a),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_171]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ! [X_39] : identity_map(domain(X_39)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_132]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X_1,Y_2] :
      ( product(X_1,Y_2,compose(X_1,Y_2))
      | ~ defined(X_1,Y_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ! [X_41] : defined(X_41,domain(X_41)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_136]) ).

tff(c_73,plain,
    ! [Y_68,Z_69,Xy_70,X_71] :
      ( defined(Y_68,Z_69)
      | ~ defined(Xy_70,Z_69)
      | ~ product(X_71,Y_68,Xy_70) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_65]) ).

tff(c_784,plain,
    ! [Y_133,X_134,X_135] :
      ( defined(Y_133,domain(X_134))
      | ~ product(X_135,Y_133,X_134) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_73]) ).

tff(c_806,plain,
    ! [Y_2,X_1] :
      ( defined(Y_2,domain(compose(X_1,Y_2)))
      | ~ defined(X_1,Y_2) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_784]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ! [X_47,Y_48] :
      ( product(X_47,Y_48,X_47)
      | ~ identity_map(Y_48)
      | ~ defined(X_47,Y_48) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_159]) ).

tff(c_805,plain,
    ! [Y_48,X_47] :
      ( defined(Y_48,domain(X_47))
      | ~ identity_map(Y_48)
      | ~ defined(X_47,Y_48) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_784]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ! [X_45,Y_46] :
      ( product(X_45,Y_46,Y_46)
      | ~ identity_map(X_45)
      | ~ defined(X_45,Y_46) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_151]) ).

tff(c_109,plain,
    ! [Z_74,W_75,X_76,Y_77] :
      ( ( Z_74 = W_75 )
      | ~ product(X_76,Y_77,W_75)
      | ~ product(X_76,Y_77,Z_74) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_168]) ).

tff(c_1344,plain,
    ! [Z_165,X_166,Y_167] :
      ( ( Z_165 = X_166 )
      | ~ product(X_166,Y_167,Z_165)
      | ~ identity_map(Y_167)
      | ~ defined(X_166,Y_167) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_109]) ).

tff(c_1991,plain,
    ! [Y_188,X_189] :
      ( ( Y_188 = X_189 )
      | ~ identity_map(Y_188)
      | ~ identity_map(X_189)
      | ~ defined(X_189,Y_188) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_1344]) ).

tff(c_2015,plain,
    ! [X_47,Y_48] :
      ( ( domain(X_47) = Y_48 )
      | ~ identity_map(domain(X_47))
      | ~ identity_map(Y_48)
      | ~ defined(X_47,Y_48) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_805,c_1991]) ).

tff(c_2459,plain,
    ! [X_200,Y_201] :
      ( ( domain(X_200) = Y_201 )
      | ~ identity_map(Y_201)
      | ~ defined(X_200,Y_201) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_20,c_2015]) ).

tff(c_2477,plain,
    ! [X_1,Y_2] :
      ( ( domain(compose(X_1,Y_2)) = domain(Y_2) )
      | ~ identity_map(domain(compose(X_1,Y_2)))
      | ~ defined(X_1,Y_2) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_806,c_2459]) ).

tff(c_4451,plain,
    ! [X_263,Y_264] :
      ( ( domain(compose(X_263,Y_264)) = domain(Y_264) )
      | ~ defined(X_263,Y_264) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_20,c_2477]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    domain(compose(b,a)) != domain(a),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_173]) ).

tff(c_4554,plain,
    ~ defined(b,a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4451,c_40]) ).

tff(c_4601,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_38,c_4554]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : CAT009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 18:12:45 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.90/2.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.90/2.45  
% 5.90/2.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.90/2.47  
% 5.90/2.47  Inference rules
% 5.90/2.47  ----------------------
% 5.90/2.47  #Ref     : 0
% 5.90/2.47  #Sup     : 987
% 5.90/2.47  #Fact    : 0
% 5.90/2.47  #Define  : 0
% 5.90/2.47  #Split   : 2
% 5.90/2.47  #Chain   : 0
% 5.90/2.47  #Close   : 0
% 5.90/2.47  
% 5.90/2.47  Ordering : KBO
% 5.90/2.47  
% 5.90/2.47  Simplification rules
% 5.90/2.47  ----------------------
% 5.90/2.47  #Subsume      : 210
% 5.90/2.47  #Demod        : 849
% 5.90/2.47  #Tautology    : 350
% 5.90/2.47  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 5.90/2.47  #BackRed      : 7
% 5.90/2.47  
% 5.90/2.47  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.90/2.47  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 5.90/2.47  
% 5.90/2.47  Timing (in seconds)
% 5.90/2.47  ----------------------
% 5.90/2.48  Preprocessing        : 0.48
% 5.90/2.48  Parsing              : 0.26
% 5.90/2.48  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 5.90/2.48  Main loop            : 0.93
% 5.90/2.48  Inferencing          : 0.33
% 5.90/2.48  Reduction            : 0.29
% 5.90/2.48  Demodulation         : 0.20
% 5.90/2.48  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 5.90/2.48  Subsumption          : 0.21
% 5.90/2.48  Abstraction          : 0.04
% 5.90/2.48  MUC search           : 0.00
% 5.90/2.48  Cooper               : 0.00
% 5.90/2.48  Total                : 1.45
% 5.90/2.48  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 5.90/2.48  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 5.90/2.48  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 5.90/2.48  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------