TSTP Solution File: CAT006-4 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : CAT006-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EhCOhyNGt2 true
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:20:54 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.76s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : CAT006-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.EhCOhyNGt2 true
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 00:13:52 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.76 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.22/0.76 % BCE start: 15
% 0.22/0.76 % BCE eliminated: 1
% 0.22/0.76 % PE start: 14
% 0.22/0.76 logic: eq
% 0.22/0.76 % PE eliminated: 2
% 0.22/0.76 % done 22 iterations in 0.012s
% 0.22/0.76 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.22/0.76 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.22/0.76 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(compose_type, type, compose: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(domain_type, type, domain: $i > $i).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(there_exists_type, type, there_exists: $i > $o).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(codomain_type, type, codomain: $i > $i).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(compose_codomain, axiom, (( compose @ ( codomain @ X ) @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.22/0.76 (![X0 : $i]: ((compose @ (codomain @ X0) @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compose_codomain])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(xd_equals_x, axiom,
% 0.22/0.76 (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ d ) ) ) |
% 0.22/0.76 ( ( compose @ X @ d ) = ( X ) ))).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.22/0.76 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.76 (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ d)) | ((compose @ X0 @ d) = (X0)))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [xd_equals_x])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl50, plain,
% 0.22/0.76 ((~ (there_exists @ d) | ((d) = (codomain @ d)))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl12])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(da_exists, axiom, (there_exists @ ( compose @ d @ a ))).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain, ( (there_exists @ (compose @ d @ a))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [da_exists])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(composition_implies_domain, axiom,
% 0.22/0.76 (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) ) ) |
% 0.22/0.76 ( there_exists @ ( domain @ X ) ))).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.22/0.76 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.76 (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.22/0.76 | (there_exists @ (domain @ X0)))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [composition_implies_domain])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl52, plain, ( (there_exists @ (domain @ d))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(domain_has_elements, axiom,
% 0.22/0.76 (( ~( there_exists @ ( domain @ X ) ) ) | ( there_exists @ X ))).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.22/0.76 (![X0 : $i]: (~ (there_exists @ (domain @ X0)) | (there_exists @ X0))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_has_elements])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl56, plain, ( (there_exists @ d)),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl52, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl57, plain, (((d) = (codomain @ d))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl50, zip_derived_cl56])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.22/0.76 (![X0 : $i]: ((compose @ (codomain @ X0) @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compose_codomain])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl62, plain, (((compose @ d @ d) = (d))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl57, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(domain_codomain_composition1, axiom,
% 0.22/0.76 (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) ) ) |
% 0.22/0.76 ( ( domain @ X ) = ( codomain @ Y ) ))).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.22/0.76 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.76 (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.22/0.76 | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ X1)))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition1])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl91, plain,
% 0.22/0.76 ((~ (there_exists @ d) | ((domain @ d) = (codomain @ d)))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl62, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl56, plain, ( (there_exists @ d)),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl52, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl57, plain, (((d) = (codomain @ d))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl50, zip_derived_cl56])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl96, plain, (((domain @ d) = (d))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.22/0.76 [zip_derived_cl91, zip_derived_cl56, zip_derived_cl57])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(prove_codomain_of_a_is_d, conjecture, (( codomain @ a ) = ( d ))).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( codomain @ a ) != ( d )),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_codomain_of_a_is_d])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain, (((codomain @ a) != (d))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain, ( (there_exists @ (compose @ d @ a))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [da_exists])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.22/0.76 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.22/0.76 (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.22/0.76 | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ X1)))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition1])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl58, plain, (((domain @ d) = (codomain @ a))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl64, plain, (((domain @ d) != (d))),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl14, zip_derived_cl58])).
% 0.22/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl97, plain, ($false),
% 0.22/0.76 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.22/0.76 [zip_derived_cl96, zip_derived_cl64])).
% 0.22/0.76
% 0.22/0.76 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.22/0.76
% 0.22/0.76
% 0.22/0.76 % Terminating...
% 1.49/0.87 % Runner terminated.
% 1.53/0.88 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------