TSTP Solution File: CAT006-4 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : CAT006-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:07:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   16 (   5 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(domain_has_elements,axiom,
    ( ~ there_exists(domain(X))
    | there_exists(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT004-0.ax',domain_has_elements) ).

cnf(composition_implies_domain,axiom,
    ( ~ there_exists(compose(X,Y))
    | there_exists(domain(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT004-0.ax',composition_implies_domain) ).

cnf(domain_codomain_composition1,axiom,
    ( ~ there_exists(compose(X,Y))
    | domain(X) = codomain(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT004-0.ax',domain_codomain_composition1) ).

cnf(compose_domain,axiom,
    compose(X,domain(X)) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT004-0.ax',compose_domain) ).

cnf(da_exists,hypothesis,
    there_exists(compose(d,a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',da_exists) ).

cnf(dx_equals_x,hypothesis,
    ( ~ there_exists(compose(d,X))
    | compose(d,X) = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dx_equals_x) ).

cnf(prove_codomain_of_a_is_d,negated_conjecture,
    codomain(a) != d,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_codomain_of_a_is_d) ).

cnf(19,plain,
    there_exists(domain(d)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[composition_implies_domain,da_exists]) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    domain(d) = codomain(a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[domain_codomain_composition1,da_exists]) ).

cnf(23,plain,
    there_exists(codomain(a)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[19,22,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    ~ there_exists(d),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[dx_equals_x,compose_domain,theory(equality)]),prove_codomain_of_a_is_d,22,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(48,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[domain_has_elements,30]),23,22,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : CAT006-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun May 29 17:54:11 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  "."
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-29T17:54:11
% 0.19/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n019.cluster.edu at 2022-05-29T17:54:11
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.52  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|compose| ?X (|compose| ?Y ?Z)) (|compose| (|compose| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.19/0.52  
% 0.19/0.52  #||
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.52  ||#
% 0.19/0.52  
% 0.19/0.52  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.19/0.52  ;        69 formulas have been input or derived (from 18 formulas).
% 0.19/0.52  ;        48 (70%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.19/0.52  ;            5 (10%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.19/0.52  ;           43 (90%) are still being kept.
% 0.19/0.52  ; 
% 0.19/0.52  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.004  11%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (15 calls)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.003   8%   Process new row              (64 calls)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.001   3%   Resolution                   (34 calls)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (17 calls)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (21 calls)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.001   3%   Forward subsumption          (21 calls)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (21 calls)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (17 calls)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.004  11%   Forward simplification       (64 calls)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.001   3%   Backward simplification      (48 calls)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.002   6%   Ordering                     (112 calls)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.020  56%   Other
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.036        Total
% 0.19/0.52  ;     0.038        Real time
% 0.19/0.52  ; 
% 0.19/0.52  ; Term-hash-array has 88 terms in all.
% 0.19/0.52  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 20 entries (20 at peak, 21 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 59 nodes (59 at peak, 68 added, 9 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52  ;  Retrieved 13 possibly forward subsuming rows in 21 calls.
% 0.19/0.52  ;  Retrieved 4 possibly backward subsumed rows in 21 calls.
% 0.19/0.52  ; Path-index has 85 entries (85 at peak, 91 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52  ; Path-index has 202 nodes (202 at peak, 211 added, 9 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52  ; Trie-index has 85 entries (85 at peak, 91 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52  ; Trie-index has 247 nodes (247 at peak, 261 added, 14 deleted).
% 0.19/0.52  ; Retrieved 75 generalization terms in 175 calls.
% 0.19/0.52  ; Retrieved 40 instance terms in 38 calls.
% 0.19/0.52  ; Retrieved 237 unifiable terms in 106 calls.
% 0.19/0.52  ; 
% 0.19/0.52  ; The agenda of rows to give has 26 entries:
% 0.19/0.52  ;     1 with value (4 5)           1 with value (4 9)            3 with value (4 15)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     2 with value (4 6)           1 with value (4 11)           1 with value (4 18)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     2 with value (4 7)           2 with value (4 13)           7 with value (4 20)
% 0.19/0.52  ;     2 with value (4 8)           2 with value (4 14)           2 with value (4 22)
% 0.19/0.52  Evaluation took:
% 0.19/0.52    0.039 seconds of real time
% 0.19/0.52    0.030207 seconds of user run time
% 0.19/0.52    0.008236 seconds of system run time
% 0.19/0.52    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.19/0.52    0 page faults and
% 0.19/0.52    2,300,624 bytes consed.
% 0.19/0.52  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.52  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-29T17:54:11
% 0.19/0.52  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.52  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------