TSTP Solution File: CAT005-4 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : CAT005-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:14:05 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 16 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 12 ~; 8 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 5 >; 2 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 2 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
equivalent: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
there_exists: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
domain: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
codomain: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
compose: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
a: $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
d: $i ).
cnf(domain_codomain_composition1,axiom,
( domain(X1) = codomain(X2)
| ~ there_exists(compose(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT004-0.ax',domain_codomain_composition1) ).
cnf(ad_exists,hypothesis,
there_exists(compose(a,d)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ad_exists) ).
cnf(xd_equals_x,hypothesis,
( compose(X1,d) = X1
| ~ there_exists(compose(X1,d)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',xd_equals_x) ).
cnf(compose_domain,axiom,
compose(X1,domain(X1)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT004-0.ax',compose_domain) ).
cnf(prove_domain_of_a_is_d,negated_conjecture,
domain(a) != d,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_domain_of_a_is_d) ).
cnf(composition_implies_domain,axiom,
( there_exists(domain(X1))
| ~ there_exists(compose(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT004-0.ax',composition_implies_domain) ).
cnf(compose_codomain,axiom,
compose(codomain(X1),X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT004-0.ax',compose_codomain) ).
cnf(codomain_has_elements,axiom,
( there_exists(X1)
| ~ there_exists(codomain(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT004-0.ax',codomain_has_elements) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( domain(X1) = codomain(X2)
| ~ there_exists(compose(X1,X2)) ),
domain_codomain_composition1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
there_exists(compose(a,d)),
ad_exists ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
( compose(X1,d) = X1
| ~ there_exists(compose(X1,d)) ),
xd_equals_x ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
compose(X1,domain(X1)) = X1,
compose_domain ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
domain(a) = codomain(d),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
compose(a,d) = a,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
domain(a) != d,
prove_domain_of_a_is_d ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
( there_exists(domain(X1))
| ~ there_exists(compose(X1,X2)) ),
composition_implies_domain ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
compose(a,codomain(d)) = a,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
there_exists(a),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
compose(codomain(X1),X1) = X1,
compose_codomain ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
codomain(d) != d,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
( there_exists(X1)
| ~ there_exists(codomain(X1)) ),
codomain_has_elements ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
there_exists(codomain(d)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_12]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
~ there_exists(d),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CAT005-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 00:19:14 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.53 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.55 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.55 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.55 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.55 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.55 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.55 % Total time : 0.005000 s
% 0.20/0.55 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.55 % Total time : 0.007000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------