TSTP Solution File: CAT005-4 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : CAT005-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:34:36 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.18s 1.88s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  20 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (  21 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   37 (  20   ~;  17   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   5   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (;  22   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ equivalent > there_exists > compose > #nlpp > domain > codomain > d > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(equivalent,type,
    equivalent: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(domain,type,
    domain: $i > $i ).

tff(there_exists,type,
    there_exists: $i > $o ).

tff(codomain,type,
    codomain: $i > $i ).

tff(d,type,
    d: $i ).

tff(compose,type,
    compose: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_121,axiom,
    domain(a) != d,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_109,axiom,
    there_exists(compose(a,d)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_86,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ there_exists(compose(X,Y))
      | there_exists(domain(X)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_76,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ~ there_exists(domain(X))
      | there_exists(X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_103,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( compose(X,domain(X)) = X ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_119,axiom,
    ! [Y] :
      ( ~ there_exists(compose(d,Y))
      | ( compose(d,Y) = Y ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_91,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ there_exists(compose(X,Y))
      | ( domain(X) = codomain(Y) ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_81,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ~ there_exists(codomain(X))
      | there_exists(X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_105,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( compose(codomain(X),X) = X ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_114,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( ~ there_exists(compose(X,d))
      | ( compose(X,d) = X ) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    domain(a) != d,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_121]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    there_exists(compose(a,d)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_109]) ).

tff(c_63,plain,
    ! [X_31,Y_32] :
      ( there_exists(domain(X_31))
      | ~ there_exists(compose(X_31,Y_32)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_86]) ).

tff(c_73,plain,
    there_exists(domain(a)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_63]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [X_7] :
      ( there_exists(X_7)
      | ~ there_exists(domain(X_7)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_76]) ).

tff(c_77,plain,
    there_exists(a),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_8]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ! [X_18] : ( compose(X_18,domain(X_18)) = X_18 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_103]) ).

tff(c_93,plain,
    ! [Y_36] :
      ( ( compose(d,Y_36) = Y_36 )
      | ~ there_exists(compose(d,Y_36)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_119]) ).

tff(c_97,plain,
    ( ( compose(d,domain(d)) = domain(d) )
    | ~ there_exists(d) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_20,c_93]) ).

tff(c_98,plain,
    ( ( domain(d) = d )
    | ~ there_exists(d) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_20,c_97]) ).

tff(c_99,plain,
    ~ there_exists(d),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_98]) ).

tff(c_110,plain,
    ! [X_38,Y_39] :
      ( ( domain(X_38) = codomain(Y_39) )
      | ~ there_exists(compose(X_38,Y_39)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_91]) ).

tff(c_120,plain,
    domain(a) = codomain(d),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_110]) ).

tff(c_142,plain,
    there_exists(codomain(d)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_120,c_73]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [X_8] :
      ( there_exists(X_8)
      | ~ there_exists(codomain(X_8)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_81]) ).

tff(c_162,plain,
    there_exists(d),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_142,c_10]) ).

tff(c_166,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_162]) ).

tff(c_168,plain,
    there_exists(d),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_98]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ! [X_19] : ( compose(codomain(X_19),X_19) = X_19 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_105]) ).

tff(c_186,plain,
    ! [X_40] :
      ( ( compose(X_40,d) = X_40 )
      | ~ there_exists(compose(X_40,d)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_114]) ).

tff(c_190,plain,
    ( ( compose(codomain(d),d) = codomain(d) )
    | ~ there_exists(d) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_22,c_186]) ).

tff(c_195,plain,
    codomain(d) = d,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_168,c_22,c_190]) ).

tff(c_196,plain,
    compose(a,d) = a,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_186]) ).

tff(c_254,plain,
    ! [X_41,Y_42] :
      ( ( domain(X_41) = codomain(Y_42) )
      | ~ there_exists(compose(X_41,Y_42)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_91]) ).

tff(c_260,plain,
    ( ( domain(a) = codomain(d) )
    | ~ there_exists(a) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_196,c_254]) ).

tff(c_270,plain,
    domain(a) = d,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_77,c_195,c_260]) ).

tff(c_272,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_30,c_270]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : CAT005-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.18/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:47:22 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.18/1.88  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.18/1.89  
% 3.18/1.89  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.18/1.91  
% 3.18/1.91  Inference rules
% 3.18/1.91  ----------------------
% 3.18/1.91  #Ref     : 0
% 3.18/1.91  #Sup     : 56
% 3.18/1.91  #Fact    : 0
% 3.18/1.91  #Define  : 0
% 3.18/1.91  #Split   : 1
% 3.18/1.91  #Chain   : 0
% 3.18/1.91  #Close   : 0
% 3.18/1.91  
% 3.18/1.91  Ordering : KBO
% 3.18/1.91  
% 3.18/1.91  Simplification rules
% 3.18/1.91  ----------------------
% 3.18/1.91  #Subsume      : 1
% 3.18/1.91  #Demod        : 44
% 3.18/1.91  #Tautology    : 36
% 3.18/1.91  #SimpNegUnit  : 2
% 3.18/1.91  #BackRed      : 4
% 3.18/1.91  
% 3.18/1.91  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.18/1.91  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.18/1.91  
% 3.18/1.91  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.18/1.91  ----------------------
% 3.36/1.92  Preprocessing        : 0.49
% 3.36/1.92  Parsing              : 0.26
% 3.36/1.92  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.36/1.92  Main loop            : 0.28
% 3.36/1.92  Inferencing          : 0.11
% 3.36/1.92  Reduction            : 0.08
% 3.36/1.92  Demodulation         : 0.05
% 3.36/1.92  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 3.36/1.92  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 3.36/1.92  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.36/1.92  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.36/1.92  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.36/1.92  Total                : 0.82
% 3.36/1.92  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.36/1.92  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.36/1.92  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.36/1.92  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------