TSTP Solution File: CAT004-4 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : CAT004-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UiYelc8ShK true
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:20:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.88s 1.30s
% Output : Refutation 1.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CAT004-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UiYelc8ShK true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 01:04:05 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.63 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.63 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.63 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.88/1.30 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 1.88/1.30 % BCE start: 17
% 1.88/1.30 % BCE eliminated: 1
% 1.88/1.30 % PE start: 16
% 1.88/1.30 logic: eq
% 1.88/1.30 % PE eliminated: 2
% 1.88/1.30 % done 1092 iterations in 0.539s
% 1.88/1.30 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.88/1.30 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.88/1.30 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(h_type, type, h: $i).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(compose_type, type, compose: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(g_type, type, g: $i).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(associativity_of_compose, axiom,
% 1.88/1.30 (( compose @ X @ ( compose @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 1.88/1.30 ( compose @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 1.88/1.30 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.88/1.30 ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.88/1.30 = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(h_ab_equals_g_ab, axiom,
% 1.88/1.30 (( compose @ h @ ( compose @ a @ b ) ) =
% 1.88/1.30 ( compose @ g @ ( compose @ a @ b ) ))).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 1.88/1.30 (((compose @ h @ (compose @ a @ b)) = (compose @ g @ (compose @ a @ b)))),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [h_ab_equals_g_ab])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 1.88/1.30 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.88/1.30 ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.88/1.30 = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(cancellation_for_product2, axiom,
% 1.88/1.30 (( ( compose @ X @ b ) != ( Y ) ) | ( ( compose @ Z @ b ) != ( Y ) ) |
% 1.88/1.30 ( ( X ) = ( Z ) ))).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 1.88/1.30 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.88/1.30 (((compose @ X1 @ b) != (X0))
% 1.88/1.30 | ((compose @ X2 @ b) != (X0))
% 1.88/1.30 | ((X1) = (X2)))),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cancellation_for_product2])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl52, plain,
% 1.88/1.30 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.88/1.30 (((X0) = (X1)) | ((compose @ X1 @ b) != (compose @ X0 @ b)))),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl89, plain,
% 1.88/1.30 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.88/1.30 (((compose @ X1 @ (compose @ X0 @ b)) != (compose @ X2 @ b))
% 1.88/1.30 | ((X2) = (compose @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl52])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl620, plain,
% 1.88/1.30 (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.88/1.30 (((compose @ h @ (compose @ a @ b)) != (compose @ X0 @ b))
% 1.88/1.30 | ((X0) = (compose @ g @ a)))),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl89])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl634, plain,
% 1.88/1.30 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.88/1.30 (((compose @ h @ (compose @ a @ b))
% 1.88/1.30 != (compose @ X1 @ (compose @ X0 @ b)))
% 1.88/1.30 | ((compose @ X1 @ X0) = (compose @ g @ a)))),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl620])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl6747, plain, (((compose @ h @ a) = (compose @ g @ a))),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl634])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(cancellation_for_product1, axiom,
% 1.88/1.30 (( ( compose @ X @ a ) != ( Y ) ) | ( ( compose @ Z @ a ) != ( Y ) ) |
% 1.88/1.30 ( ( X ) = ( Z ) ))).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 1.88/1.30 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.88/1.30 (((compose @ X1 @ a) != (X0))
% 1.88/1.30 | ((compose @ X2 @ a) != (X0))
% 1.88/1.30 | ((X1) = (X2)))),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cancellation_for_product1])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl50, plain,
% 1.88/1.30 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.88/1.30 (((X0) = (X1)) | ((compose @ X1 @ a) != (compose @ X0 @ a)))),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl6784, plain,
% 1.88/1.30 (![X0 : $i]: (((compose @ h @ a) != (compose @ X0 @ a)) | ((X0) = (g)))),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6747, zip_derived_cl50])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl6889, plain, (((h) = (g))),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6784])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(prove_h_equals_g, conjecture, (( h ) = ( g ))).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( h ) != ( g )),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_h_equals_g])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, (((h) != (g))),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.88/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl6890, plain, ($false),
% 1.88/1.30 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 1.88/1.30 [zip_derived_cl6889, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 1.88/1.30
% 1.88/1.30 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.88/1.30
% 1.88/1.30
% 1.88/1.30 % Terminating...
% 1.88/1.35 % Runner terminated.
% 1.88/1.36 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------