TSTP Solution File: CAT004-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : CAT004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:07:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.91s 1.12s
% Output   : Refutation 0.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   32 (   4 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(closure_of_composition,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X,Y)
    | product(X,Y,compose(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',closure_of_composition) ).

cnf(associative_property1,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X,Y,Z)
    | defined(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',associative_property1) ).

cnf(category_theory_axiom3,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ defined(U,Z)
    | defined(U,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',category_theory_axiom3) ).

cnf(category_theory_axiom5,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ product(U,Z,V)
    | ~ product(U,X,W)
    | product(W,Y,V) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',category_theory_axiom5) ).

cnf(cancellation_for_product1,hypothesis,
    ( ~ product(X,a,Y)
    | ~ product(Z,a,Y)
    | X = Z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cancellation_for_product1) ).

cnf(cancellation_for_product2,hypothesis,
    ( ~ product(X,b,Y)
    | ~ product(Z,b,Y)
    | X = Z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cancellation_for_product2) ).

cnf(ab_equals_c,hypothesis,
    product(a,b,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ab_equals_c) ).

cnf(hc_equals_d,hypothesis,
    product(h,c,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hc_equals_d) ).

cnf(gc_equals_d,hypothesis,
    product(g,c,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',gc_equals_d) ).

cnf(prove_h_equals_g,negated_conjecture,
    h != g,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_h_equals_g) ).

cnf(25,plain,
    defined(h,c),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[associative_property1,hc_equals_d]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    defined(g,c),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[associative_property1,gc_equals_d]) ).

cnf(58,plain,
    defined(h,a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[category_theory_axiom3,25,ab_equals_c]) ).

cnf(64,plain,
    defined(g,a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[category_theory_axiom3,26,ab_equals_c]) ).

cnf(76,plain,
    product(h,a,compose(h,a)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[closure_of_composition,58]) ).

cnf(79,plain,
    product(g,a,compose(g,a)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[closure_of_composition,64]) ).

cnf(655,plain,
    product(compose(h,a),b,d),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[category_theory_axiom5,76,ab_equals_c,hc_equals_d]) ).

cnf(674,plain,
    product(compose(g,a),b,d),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[category_theory_axiom5,79,ab_equals_c,gc_equals_d]) ).

cnf(675,plain,
    ~ product(h,a,compose(g,a)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cancellation_for_product1,79,prove_h_equals_g]) ).

cnf(1924,plain,
    compose(g,a) = compose(h,a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cancellation_for_product2,674,655]) ).

cnf(1925,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[76,675,1924,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : CAT004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun May 29 16:50:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.45   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.45   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.45   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.45   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  "."
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-29T16:50:11
% 0.18/0.45  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n019.cluster.edu at 2022-05-29T16:50:11
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|product| ?Z ?U ?V)) (NOT (|product| ?Y ?U ?W)) (|product| ?X ?W ?V)).
% 0.18/0.47  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|product| ?U ?Z ?V)) (NOT (|product| ?U ?X ?W)) (|product| ?W ?Y ?V)).
% 0.91/1.12  ; Recognized relation functionality assertion (OR (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (NOT (|product| ?X ?Y ?U)) (= ?Z ?U)).
% 0.91/1.12  
% 0.91/1.12  #||
% 0.91/1.12  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/1.12  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.91/1.13  ||#
% 0.91/1.13  
% 0.91/1.13  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.91/1.13  ;     17009 formulas have been input or derived (from 233 formulas).
% 0.91/1.13  ;      1925 (11%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.91/1.13  ;         1229 (64%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.91/1.13  ;          696 (36%) are still being kept.
% 0.91/1.13  ; 
% 0.91/1.13  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.005   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (24 calls)
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.095  14%   Process new row              (14,111 calls)
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.406  61%   Resolution                   (464 calls)
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.002   0%   Paramodulation               (232 calls)
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.003   0%   Condensing                   (14 calls)
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (14 calls)
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (14 calls)
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (18 calls)
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.062   9%   Forward simplification       (12,491 calls)
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.036   5%   Backward simplification      (1,925 calls)
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.001   0%   Ordering                     (137 calls)
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.058   9%   Other
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.669        Total
% 0.91/1.13  ;     0.677        Real time
% 0.91/1.13  ; 
% 0.91/1.13  ; Term-hash-array has 2,435 terms in all.
% 0.91/1.13  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 14 entries (14 at peak, 14 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.91/1.13  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 22 nodes (22 at peak, 22 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.91/1.13  ;  Retrieved 13 possibly forward subsuming rows in 14 calls.
% 0.91/1.13  ;  Retrieved 5 possibly backward subsumed rows in 14 calls.
% 0.91/1.13  ; Path-index has 962 entries (1,879 at peak, 2,442 added, 1,480 deleted).
% 0.91/1.13  ; Path-index has 1,239 nodes (1,606 at peak, 1,900 added, 661 deleted).
% 0.91/1.13  ; Trie-index has 962 entries (1,879 at peak, 2,442 added, 1,480 deleted).
% 0.91/1.13  ; Trie-index has 2,625 nodes (4,411 at peak, 5,777 added, 3,152 deleted).
% 0.91/1.13  ; Retrieved 19,282 generalization terms in 21,672 calls.
% 0.91/1.13  ; Retrieved 2,090 instance terms in 1,910 calls.
% 0.91/1.13  ; Retrieved 431,953 unifiable terms in 43,268 calls.
% 0.91/1.13  ; 
% 0.91/1.13  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 58 entries:
% 0.91/1.13  ;    58 with value 0
% 0.91/1.13  ; The agenda of rows to process has 51 entries:
% 0.91/1.13  ;    17 with value 14              4 with value 16              16 with value 17
% 0.91/1.13  ;    14 with value 15
% 0.91/1.13  ; The agenda of rows to give has 580 entries:
% 0.91/1.13  ;     5 with value (4 12)         68 with value (4 16)         128 with value (4 19)
% 0.91/1.13  ;    28 with value (4 13)        122 with value (4 17)          18 with value (4 20)
% 0.91/1.13  ;    56 with value (4 14)         69 with value (4 18)          18 with value (4 21)
% 0.91/1.13  ;    68 with value (4 15)
% 0.91/1.13  Evaluation took:
% 0.91/1.13    0.678 seconds of real time
% 0.91/1.13    0.614718 seconds of user run time
% 0.91/1.13    0.063173 seconds of system run time
% 0.91/1.13    [Run times include 0.027 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.91/1.13    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.91/1.13    0 page faults and
% 0.91/1.13    51,003,248 bytes consed.
% 0.91/1.13  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.91/1.13  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-29T16:50:11
% 0.91/1.13  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.91/1.13  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------