TSTP Solution File: CAT001-3 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CAT001-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:27:37 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 21 ( 20 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(monomorphism,hypothesis,
( X1 = X3
| compose(compose(a,b),X1) != X2
| compose(compose(a,b),X3) != X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rVacZ96ndL/E---3.1_30196.p',monomorphism) ).
cnf(associativity_of_compose,axiom,
compose(X1,compose(X2,X3)) = compose(compose(X1,X2),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rVacZ96ndL/E---3.1_30196.p',associativity_of_compose) ).
cnf(bh_equals_bg,hypothesis,
compose(b,h) = compose(b,g),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rVacZ96ndL/E---3.1_30196.p',bh_equals_bg) ).
cnf(prove_h_equals_g,negated_conjecture,
h != g,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rVacZ96ndL/E---3.1_30196.p',prove_h_equals_g) ).
cnf(c_0_4,hypothesis,
( X1 = X3
| compose(compose(a,b),X1) != X2
| compose(compose(a,b),X3) != X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[monomorphism]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
( X1 = X3
| compose(compose(a,b),X1) != X2
| compose(compose(a,b),X3) != X2 ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
compose(X1,compose(X2,X3)) = compose(compose(X1,X2),X3),
associativity_of_compose ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
( X1 = X2
| compose(a,compose(b,X1)) != compose(a,compose(b,X2)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
compose(b,h) = compose(b,g),
bh_equals_bg ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
h != g,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_h_equals_g]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
( X1 = g
| compose(a,compose(b,X1)) != compose(a,compose(b,h)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
h != g,
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : CAT001-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 11:17:14 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rVacZ96ndL/E---3.1_30196.p
% 0.21/0.52 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # new_bool_3 with pid 30324 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FHUSF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # partial match(1): FHUSM-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18AMC_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18AMC_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 30329 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18AMC_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FHUSF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # partial match(1): FHUSM-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18AMC_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 22
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 16
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.21/0.52 # Processed clauses : 15
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 15
% 0.21/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Generated clauses : 11
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.21/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Paramodulations : 8
% 0.21/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.21/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.21/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 6
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 388
% 0.21/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 63
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.21/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------