TSTP Solution File: BOO003-4 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : BOO003-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:26:37 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (  28 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   28 (  27 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(distributivity1,axiom,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PqQ5hy954L/E---3.1_20335.p',distributivity1) ).

cnf(additive_inverse1,axiom,
    add(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiplicative_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PqQ5hy954L/E---3.1_20335.p',additive_inverse1) ).

cnf(multiplicative_id1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,multiplicative_identity) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PqQ5hy954L/E---3.1_20335.p',multiplicative_id1) ).

cnf(multiplicative_inverse1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PqQ5hy954L/E---3.1_20335.p',multiplicative_inverse1) ).

cnf(additive_id1,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_identity) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PqQ5hy954L/E---3.1_20335.p',additive_id1) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PqQ5hy954L/E---3.1_20335.p',commutativity_of_multiply) ).

cnf(distributivity2,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PqQ5hy954L/E---3.1_20335.p',distributivity2) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_add,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PqQ5hy954L/E---3.1_20335.p',commutativity_of_add) ).

cnf(prove_a_times_a_is_a,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,a) != a,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PqQ5hy954L/E---3.1_20335.p',prove_a_times_a_is_a) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(add(X1,X2),add(X1,X3)),
    distributivity1 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    add(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiplicative_identity,
    additive_inverse1 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    multiply(X1,multiplicative_identity) = X1,
    multiplicative_id1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X1))) = add(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = additive_identity,
    multiplicative_inverse1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    add(X1,additive_identity) = X1,
    additive_id1 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_multiply ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    add(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    multiply(multiplicative_identity,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    multiply(X1,add(X1,X2)) = add(X1,multiply(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    multiply(X1,add(X2,X3)) = add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    distributivity2 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    add(X1,multiplicative_identity) = multiplicative_identity,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_17]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
    commutativity_of_add ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,a) != a,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_a_times_a_is_a]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X1,X1)) = multiply(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    add(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_11]),c_0_20]),c_0_11]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(a,a) != a,
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    multiply(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : BOO003-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 11:46:25 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.PqQ5hy954L/E---3.1_20335.p
% 0.20/0.50  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # sh5l with pid 20462 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 20469 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.20/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 66
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 11
% 0.20/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 15
% 0.20/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 40
% 0.20/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 11
% 0.20/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 304
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 204
% 0.20/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 304
% 0.20/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 295
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of those cached                   : 224
% 0.20/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 20
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 18
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.20/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 155
% 0.20/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 155
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 20
% 0.20/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.20/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 114
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 40
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2478
% 0.20/0.50  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1608 pages
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.20/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.50  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------