TSTP Solution File: BIO002+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : BIO002+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 22:50:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 118.57s 56.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 118.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_223473,negated_conjecture,
    ~ has_part_2(a_cell,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3tgl8flr/input.p',i_0_223473) ).

cnf(i_0_37383,plain,
    ( has_part_2(X1,fn_cell_14(X1))
    | ~ cell_1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3tgl8flr/input.p',i_0_37383) ).

cnf(i_0_223472,plain,
    cell_1(a_cell),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3tgl8flr/input.p',i_0_223472) ).

cnf(c_0_223477,negated_conjecture,
    ~ has_part_2(a_cell,X1),
    i_0_223473 ).

cnf(c_0_223478,plain,
    ( has_part_2(X1,fn_cell_14(X1))
    | ~ cell_1(X1) ),
    i_0_37383 ).

cnf(c_0_223479,plain,
    cell_1(a_cell),
    i_0_223472 ).

cnf(c_0_223480,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_223477,c_0_223478]),c_0_223479])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : BIO002+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v6.4.1.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 16:46:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 2.82/3.00  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.82/3.00  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 2.82/3.00  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 2.82/3.00  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 52.49/47.88  Traceback (most recent call last):
% 52.49/47.88    File "./select.py", line 11, in <module>
% 52.49/47.88      pred = float(parts[0])
% 52.49/47.88  ValueError: could not convert string to float: 'cnf(i_0_99,'
% 118.57/56.35  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 118.57/56.35  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 118.57/56.35  # Preprocessing time       : 7.062 s
% 118.57/56.35  
% 118.57/56.35  # Proof found!
% 118.57/56.35  # SZS status Theorem
% 118.57/56.35  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 118.57/56.35  # Proof object total steps             : 7
% 118.57/56.35  # Proof object clause steps            : 4
% 118.57/56.35  # Proof object formula steps           : 3
% 118.57/56.35  # Proof object conjectures             : 3
% 118.57/56.35  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 118.57/56.35  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 1
% 118.57/56.35  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 3
% 118.57/56.35  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
% 118.57/56.35  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 118.57/56.35  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 118.57/56.35  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 118.57/56.35  # Parsed axioms                        : 212316
% 118.57/56.35  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Initial clauses                      : 212316
% 118.57/56.35  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 212316
% 118.57/56.35  # Processed clauses                    : 5810
% 118.57/56.35  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # ...subsumed                          : 1207
% 118.57/56.35  # ...remaining for further processing  : 4603
% 118.57/56.35  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Generated clauses                    : 1855
% 118.57/56.35  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1851
% 118.57/56.35  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Paramodulations                      : 1855
% 118.57/56.35  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Current number of processed clauses  : 4603
% 118.57/56.35  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 25
% 118.57/56.35  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 118.57/56.35  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 118.57/56.35  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4577
% 118.57/56.35  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 208357
% 118.57/56.35  # ...number of literals in the above   : 418194
% 118.57/56.35  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6594842
% 118.57/56.35  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5913167
% 118.57/56.35  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1207
% 118.57/56.35  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 118.57/56.35  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 118.57/56.35  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2817114
% 118.57/56.35  
% 118.57/56.35  # -------------------------------------------------
% 118.57/56.35  # User time                : 7.527 s
% 118.57/56.35  # System time              : 0.325 s
% 118.57/56.35  # Total time               : 7.852 s
% 118.57/56.35  # ...preprocessing         : 7.062 s
% 118.57/56.35  # ...main loop             : 0.789 s
% 118.57/56.35  # Maximum resident set size: 560784 pages
% 118.57/56.35  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------