TSTP Solution File: ARI734_1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : ARI734_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:49:01 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.56s 0.68s
% Output : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 22
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 60 ( 14 unt; 9 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 156 ( 78 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 191 ( 86 ~; 67 |; 24 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 268 ( 7 atm; 87 fun; 117 num; 57 var)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 8 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 16 ( 12 usr; 5 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 1 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 57 ( 46 !; 11 ?; 57 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_7,type,
sK0: $int ).
tff(pred_def_3,type,
sP1: $int > $o ).
tff(pred_def_4,type,
sP2: $int > $o ).
tff(pred_def_5,type,
sP3: $int > $o ).
tff(pred_def_6,type,
sP4: $int > $o ).
tff(pred_def_7,type,
sP5: $int > $o ).
tff(pred_def_8,type,
sP6: $int > $o ).
tff(pred_def_9,type,
sP7: $int > $o ).
tff(pred_def_10,type,
sP8: $int > $o ).
tff(f1160,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f64,f72,f144,f906,f1159]) ).
tff(f1159,plain,
( ~ spl9_1
| ~ spl9_3 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f1158]) ).
tff(f1158,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl9_1
| ~ spl9_3 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f1152,f67]) ).
tff(f67,plain,
( ! [X3: $int] : sP6(X3)
| ~ spl9_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f66]) ).
tff(f66,plain,
( spl9_3
<=> ! [X3: $int] : sP6(X3) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_3])]) ).
tff(f1152,plain,
( ~ sP6(-1)
| ~ spl9_1 ),
inference(evaluation,[],[f946]) ).
tff(f946,plain,
( ~ sP6($sum(-1,0))
| ~ spl9_1 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f74,f60]) ).
tff(f60,plain,
( ( 0 = sK0 )
| ~ spl9_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f58]) ).
tff(f58,plain,
( spl9_1
<=> ( 0 = sK0 ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_1])]) ).
tff(f74,plain,
~ sP6($sum(-1,sK0)),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f52,f4]) ).
tff(f4,plain,
! [X0: $int,X1: $int] : ( $sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0) ),
introduced(theory_axiom_135,[]) ).
tff(f52,plain,
~ sP6($sum(sK0,-1)),
inference(evaluation,[],[f37]) ).
tff(f37,plain,
~ sP6($sum(sK0,$uminus(1))),
introduced(inequality_splitting_name_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP6])]) ).
tff(f906,plain,
~ spl9_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f905]) ).
tff(f905,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl9_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f903,f33]) ).
tff(f33,plain,
~ sP3($product(2,sK0)),
introduced(inequality_splitting_name_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP3])]) ).
tff(f903,plain,
( sP3($product(2,sK0))
| ~ spl9_2 ),
inference(evaluation,[],[f902]) ).
tff(f902,plain,
( sP3($product(2,$sum(1,$sum(-1,sK0))))
| ~ spl9_2 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f145,f879]) ).
tff(f879,plain,
! [X0: $int,X1: $int] : ( $product(X0,$sum(1,X1)) = $sum(X0,$product(X0,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f19,f17]) ).
tff(f17,plain,
! [X0: $int] : ( $product(X0,1) = X0 ),
introduced(theory_axiom_137,[]) ).
tff(f19,plain,
! [X2: $int,X0: $int,X1: $int] : ( $product(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($product(X0,X1),$product(X0,X2)) ),
introduced(theory_axiom_150,[]) ).
tff(f145,plain,
( sP3($sum(2,$product(2,$sum(-1,sK0))))
| ~ spl9_2 ),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f75,f63]) ).
tff(f63,plain,
( ! [X3: $int] :
( sP3($sum(2,$product(2,X3)))
| sP4(X3) )
| ~ spl9_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f62]) ).
tff(f62,plain,
( spl9_2
<=> ! [X3: $int] :
( sP3($sum(2,$product(2,X3)))
| sP4(X3) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_2])]) ).
tff(f75,plain,
~ sP4($sum(-1,sK0)),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f51,f4]) ).
tff(f51,plain,
~ sP4($sum(sK0,-1)),
inference(evaluation,[],[f34]) ).
tff(f34,plain,
~ sP4($sum(sK0,$uminus(1))),
introduced(inequality_splitting_name_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP4])]) ).
tff(f144,plain,
( ~ spl9_1
| ~ spl9_4 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f143]) ).
tff(f143,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl9_1
| ~ spl9_4 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f140,f71]) ).
tff(f71,plain,
( sP5(0)
| ~ spl9_4 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f69]) ).
tff(f69,plain,
( spl9_4
<=> sP5(0) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_4])]) ).
tff(f140,plain,
( ~ sP5(0)
| ~ spl9_1 ),
inference(evaluation,[],[f129]) ).
tff(f129,plain,
( ~ sP5($product(2,0))
| ~ spl9_1 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f36,f60]) ).
tff(f36,plain,
~ sP5($product(2,sK0)),
introduced(inequality_splitting_name_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP5])]) ).
tff(f72,plain,
( spl9_3
| ~ spl9_1
| spl9_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f48,f69,f58,f66]) ).
tff(f48,plain,
! [X3: $int] :
( sP5(0)
| ( 0 != sK0 )
| sP6(X3) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f47]) ).
tff(f47,plain,
! [X2: $int,X3: $int] :
( sP5(0)
| ( 0 != sK0 )
| ( $product(2,X3) != X2 )
| sP6(X3) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f38]) ).
tff(f38,plain,
! [X2: $int,X3: $int,X1: $int] :
( sP5(X1)
| ( 0 != sK0 )
| ( 0 != X1 )
| ( $product(2,X3) != X2 )
| sP6(X3) ),
inference(inequality_splitting,[],[f27,f37,f36]) ).
tff(f27,plain,
! [X2: $int,X3: $int,X1: $int] :
( ( $product(2,sK0) != X1 )
| ( 0 != sK0 )
| ( 0 != X1 )
| ( $product(2,X3) != X2 )
| ( $sum(sK0,$uminus(1)) != X3 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).
tff(f24,plain,
( ! [X1: $int] :
( ( $product(2,sK0) != X1 )
| ! [X2: $int] :
( ( ( $sum(X2,2) != X1 )
& ( 0 != sK0 ) )
| ( ( 0 != X1 )
& ( 0 = sK0 ) )
| ! [X3: $int] :
( ( $product(2,X3) != X2 )
| ( $sum(sK0,$uminus(1)) != X3 ) ) ) )
& ~ $less(sK0,0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f22,f23]) ).
tff(f23,plain,
( ? [X0: $int] :
( ! [X1: $int] :
( ( $product(2,X0) != X1 )
| ! [X2: $int] :
( ( ( $sum(X2,2) != X1 )
& ( 0 != X0 ) )
| ( ( 0 != X1 )
& ( 0 = X0 ) )
| ! [X3: $int] :
( ( $product(2,X3) != X2 )
| ( $sum(X0,$uminus(1)) != X3 ) ) ) )
& ~ $less(X0,0) )
=> ( ! [X1: $int] :
( ( $product(2,sK0) != X1 )
| ! [X2: $int] :
( ( ( $sum(X2,2) != X1 )
& ( 0 != sK0 ) )
| ( ( 0 != X1 )
& ( 0 = sK0 ) )
| ! [X3: $int] :
( ( $product(2,X3) != X2 )
| ( $sum(sK0,$uminus(1)) != X3 ) ) ) )
& ~ $less(sK0,0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f22,plain,
? [X0: $int] :
( ! [X1: $int] :
( ( $product(2,X0) != X1 )
| ! [X2: $int] :
( ( ( $sum(X2,2) != X1 )
& ( 0 != X0 ) )
| ( ( 0 != X1 )
& ( 0 = X0 ) )
| ! [X3: $int] :
( ( $product(2,X3) != X2 )
| ( $sum(X0,$uminus(1)) != X3 ) ) ) )
& ~ $less(X0,0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tff(f3,plain,
~ ! [X0: $int] :
( ~ $less(X0,0)
=> ? [X1: $int] :
( ( $product(2,X0) = X1 )
& ? [X2: $int] :
( ( ( 0 != X0 )
=> ( $sum(X2,2) = X1 ) )
& ( ( 0 = X0 )
=> ( 0 = X1 ) )
& ? [X3: $int] :
( ( $product(2,X3) = X2 )
& ( $sum(X0,$uminus(1)) = X3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2]) ).
tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0: $int] :
( $greatereq(X0,0)
=> ? [X1: $int] :
( ( $product(2,X0) = X1 )
& ? [X2: $int] :
( ( ( 0 != X0 )
=> ( $sum(X2,2) = X1 ) )
& ( ( 0 = X0 )
=> ( 0 = X1 ) )
& ? [X3: $int] :
( ( $product(2,X3) = X2 )
& ( $difference(X0,1) = X3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
tff(f1,conjecture,
! [X0: $int] :
( $greatereq(X0,0)
=> ? [X1: $int] :
( ( $product(2,X0) = X1 )
& ? [X2: $int] :
( ( ( 0 != X0 )
=> ( $sum(X2,2) = X1 ) )
& ( ( 0 = X0 )
=> ( 0 = X1 ) )
& ? [X3: $int] :
( ( $product(2,X3) = X2 )
& ( $difference(X0,1) = X3 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',formula) ).
tff(f64,plain,
( spl9_1
| spl9_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f56,f62,f58]) ).
tff(f56,plain,
! [X3: $int] :
( sP3($sum(2,$product(2,X3)))
| ( 0 = sK0 )
| sP4(X3) ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f46,f4]) ).
tff(f46,plain,
! [X3: $int] :
( sP3($sum($product(2,X3),2))
| ( 0 = sK0 )
| sP4(X3) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f45]) ).
tff(f45,plain,
! [X2: $int,X3: $int] :
( sP3($sum(X2,2))
| ( 0 = sK0 )
| ( $product(2,X3) != X2 )
| sP4(X3) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f35]) ).
tff(f35,plain,
! [X2: $int,X3: $int,X1: $int] :
( sP3(X1)
| ( $sum(X2,2) != X1 )
| ( 0 = sK0 )
| ( $product(2,X3) != X2 )
| sP4(X3) ),
inference(inequality_splitting,[],[f28,f34,f33]) ).
tff(f28,plain,
! [X2: $int,X3: $int,X1: $int] :
( ( $product(2,sK0) != X1 )
| ( $sum(X2,2) != X1 )
| ( 0 = sK0 )
| ( $product(2,X3) != X2 )
| ( $sum(sK0,$uminus(1)) != X3 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : ARI734_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 19 13:21:23 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.33 This is a TF0_THM_EQU_ARI problem
% 0.12/0.34 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/0.64 % (15992)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/56Mi)
% 0.48/0.64 % (15985)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/34Mi)
% 0.48/0.64 % (15987)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/78Mi)
% 0.48/0.64 % (15986)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/51Mi)
% 0.48/0.64 % (15989)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/34Mi)
% 0.48/0.64 % (15988)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/33Mi)
% 0.48/0.64 % (15990)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/45Mi)
% 0.48/0.64 % (15991)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/83Mi)
% 0.48/0.65 % (15992)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.48/0.65 % (15992)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.65 % (15992)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.48/0.65 % (15992)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.48/0.65 % (15992)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 % (15992)Memory used [KB]: 1183
% 0.48/0.65 % (15992)Time elapsed: 0.018 s
% 0.48/0.65 % (15992)Instructions burned: 57 (million)
% 0.48/0.65 % (15992)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.65 % (15992)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.66 % (15993)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.48/0.66 % (15988)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.48/0.66 % (15988)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.66 % (15988)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.48/0.66 % (15988)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.48/0.66 % (15988)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.48/0.66
% 0.48/0.66 % (15988)Memory used [KB]: 1306
% 0.48/0.66 % (15988)Time elapsed: 0.020 s
% 0.48/0.66 % (15988)Instructions burned: 33 (million)
% 0.48/0.66 % (15988)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.66 % (15988)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.66 % (15985)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.48/0.66 % (15985)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.66 % (15985)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.48/0.66 % (15985)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.48/0.66 % (15985)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.48/0.66
% 0.48/0.66 % (15985)Memory used [KB]: 1166
% 0.48/0.66 % (15985)Time elapsed: 0.021 s
% 0.48/0.66 % (15985)Instructions burned: 34 (million)
% 0.48/0.66 % (15985)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.66 % (15985)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.66 % (15989)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.48/0.66 % (15989)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.66 % (15989)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.48/0.66 % (15989)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.48/0.66 % (15989)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.48/0.66
% 0.48/0.66 % (15989)Memory used [KB]: 1197
% 0.48/0.66 % (15989)Time elapsed: 0.021 s
% 0.48/0.66 % (15989)Instructions burned: 34 (million)
% 0.48/0.66 % (15989)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.66 % (15989)------------------------------
% 0.48/0.66 % (15994)dis+3_25:4_sil=16000:sos=all:erd=off:i=50:s2at=4.0:bd=off:nm=60:sup=off:cond=on:av=off:ins=2:nwc=10.0:etr=on:to=lpo:s2agt=20:fd=off:bsr=unit_only:slsq=on:slsqr=28,19:awrs=converge:awrsf=500:tgt=ground:bs=unit_only_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/50Mi)
% 0.48/0.66 % (15995)lrs+1010_1:2_sil=4000:tgt=ground:nwc=10.0:st=2.0:i=208:sd=1:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/208Mi)
% 0.48/0.66 % (15996)lrs-1011_1:1_sil=4000:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:sp=frequency:plsql=on:nwc=10.0:i=52:aac=none:afr=on:ss=axioms:er=filter:sgt=16:rawr=on:etr=on:lma=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/52Mi)
% 0.56/0.66 % (15990)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.56/0.66 % (15990)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.66 % (15990)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.66 % (15990)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.56/0.66 % (15990)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.56/0.66
% 0.56/0.66 % (15990)Memory used [KB]: 1221
% 0.56/0.66 % (15990)Time elapsed: 0.028 s
% 0.56/0.66 % (15990)Instructions burned: 46 (million)
% 0.56/0.66 % (15990)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.66 % (15990)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.67 % (15986)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.56/0.67 % (15986)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.67 % (15986)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.67 % (15986)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.56/0.67 % (15986)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.56/0.67
% 0.56/0.67 % (15986)Memory used [KB]: 1425
% 0.56/0.67 % (15986)Time elapsed: 0.032 s
% 0.56/0.67 % (15986)Instructions burned: 52 (million)
% 0.56/0.67 % (15986)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.67 % (15986)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.67 % (15997)lrs-1010_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=reverse_arity:sos=on:urr=ec_only:i=518:sd=2:bd=off:ss=axioms:sgt=16_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/518Mi)
% 0.56/0.67 % (15998)lrs+1011_87677:1048576_sil=8000:sos=on:spb=non_intro:nwc=10.0:kmz=on:i=42:ep=RS:nm=0:ins=1:uhcvi=on:rawr=on:fde=unused:afp=2000:afq=1.444:plsq=on:nicw=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/42Mi)
% 0.56/0.67 % (15993)First to succeed.
% 0.56/0.67 % (15993)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-15984"
% 0.56/0.68 % (15993)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.56/0.68 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.68 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.68 % (15993)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.68 % (15993)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.68 % (15993)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.56/0.68
% 0.56/0.68 % (15993)Memory used [KB]: 1371
% 0.56/0.68 % (15993)Time elapsed: 0.019 s
% 0.56/0.68 % (15993)Instructions burned: 58 (million)
% 0.56/0.68 % (15984)Success in time 0.321 s
% 0.56/0.68 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------