TSTP Solution File: ARI695_1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : ARI695_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:49:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  19 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   11 (  11   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :    2 (   2 fml;   0 var)
%            Number arithmetic     :  165 (   0 atm;  94 fun;  60 num;  11 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (   2 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (  11   !;   0   ?;  11   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_0,type,
    d: $int ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    c: $int ).

tff(f202,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f201,f44]) ).

tff(f44,plain,
    ! [X1: $int] : ( 0 = $product(0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f18,f15]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] : ( $product(X1,X0) = $product(X0,X1) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_140,[]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] : ( 0 = $product(X0,0) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_154,[]) ).

tff(f201,plain,
    0 != $product(0,d),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f200]) ).

tff(f200,plain,
    0 != $product(-1,$product(d,0)),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f199,f8]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] : ( 0 = $sum(X0,$uminus(X0)) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_145,[]) ).

tff(f199,plain,
    0 != $product(-1,$product(d,$sum(c,$uminus(c)))),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f198]) ).

tff(f198,plain,
    0 != $product(-1,$product(d,$sum($sum(2,c),$sum(-2,$uminus(c))))),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f197,f19]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X0: $int,X1: $int] : ( $sum($product(X0,X1),$product(X0,X2)) = $product(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_155,[]) ).

tff(f197,plain,
    0 != $product(-1,$sum($product(d,$sum(2,c)),$product(d,$sum(-2,$uminus(c))))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f137,f19]) ).

tff(f137,plain,
    0 != $sum($product(-1,$product(d,$sum(2,c))),$product(-1,$product(d,$sum(-2,$uminus(c))))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f25,f16]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X0: $int,X1: $int] : ( $product(X0,$product(X1,X2)) = $product($product(X0,X1),X2) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_141,[]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    0 != $sum($product($product(-1,d),$sum(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(d,$sum(-2,$uminus(c))))),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f23]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    0 != $sum($product($product(-1,d),$sum(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(d,$sum($product(-1,2),$uminus(c))))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    0 != $sum($product($product(-1,d),$sum(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(d,$sum($product(-1,2),$uminus(c))))),
    inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f3,plain,
    ( ( ~ 0 )
    = $sum($product($product(-1,d),$sum(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(d,$sum($product(-1,2),$uminus(c))))) ),
    inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ $sum($product($product(-1,d),$sum(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(d,$difference($product(-1,2),c)))) )
    = 0 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    $sum($product($product(-1,d),$sum(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(d,$difference($product(-1,2),c)))) = 0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : ARI695=1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 16:10:45 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  % (28013)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/100Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (28021)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/100Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (28021)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.52  % (28021)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52  % (28021)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (28021)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.52  % (28021)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.52  % (28021)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  % (28021)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.20/0.52  % (28021)Time elapsed: 0.099 s
% 0.20/0.52  % (28021)Instructions burned: 11 (million)
% 0.20/0.52  % (28021)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (28021)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (28001)Success in time 0.169 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------