TSTP Solution File: ARI667_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI667_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:07:30 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 3.39s 1.10s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10 % Problem : ARI667_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.3.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Fri May 3 00:56:34 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.43 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.16/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.39/1.10 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.39/1.10 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 ------ iProver source info
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.39/1.10 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.39/1.10 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 ------ Parsing...
% 3.39/1.10 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.39/1.10 ------ Proving...
% 3.39/1.10 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 clauses 25
% 3.39/1.10 conjectures 2
% 3.39/1.10 EPR 8
% 3.39/1.10 Horn 22
% 3.39/1.10 unary 20
% 3.39/1.10 binary 2
% 3.39/1.10 lits 33
% 3.39/1.10 lits eq 16
% 3.39/1.10 fd_pure 0
% 3.39/1.10 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.39/1.10 fd_cond 0
% 3.39/1.10 fd_pseudo_cond 2
% 3.39/1.10 AC symbols 2
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 ------
% 3.39/1.10 Current options:
% 3.39/1.10 ------
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 ------ Proving...
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 tff(f1,axiom,(
% 3.39/1.10 $sum($product(11,a),$product(7,b)) = 1),
% 3.39/1.10 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj)).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 tff(f2,conjecture,(
% 3.39/1.10 $greatereq(-40,$product(a,b)) | $lesseq(-6,$product(a,b))),
% 3.39/1.10 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_001)).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 tff(f3,negated_conjecture,(
% 3.39/1.10 ~($greatereq(-40,$product(a,b)) | $lesseq(-6,$product(a,b)))),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 tff(f4,plain,(
% 3.39/1.10 ~(~$less(-40,$product(a,b)) | ~$less($product(a,b),-6))),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(theory_normalization,[],[f3])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 tff(f5,plain,(
% 3.39/1.10 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 3.39/1.10 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 tff(f6,plain,(
% 3.39/1.10 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 3.39/1.10 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 tff(f16,plain,(
% 3.39/1.10 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($product(X0,X1) = $product(X1,X0)) )),
% 3.39/1.10 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 tff(f17,plain,(
% 3.39/1.10 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($product(X0,$product(X1,X2)) = $product($product(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 3.39/1.10 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 tff(f23,plain,(
% 3.39/1.10 $less(-40,$product(a,b)) & $less($product(a,b),-6)),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 tff(f24,plain,(
% 3.39/1.10 $sum($product(11,a),$product(7,b)) = 1),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 tff(f25,plain,(
% 3.39/1.10 $less($product(a,b),-6)),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 tff(f26,plain,(
% 3.39/1.10 $less(-40,$product(a,b))),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 cnf(c_54,plain,
% 3.39/1.10 ($product_int($product_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $product_int(X0_3,$product_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 cnf(c_55,plain,
% 3.39/1.10 ($product_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $product_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 cnf(c_65,plain,
% 3.39/1.10 ($sum_int($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 cnf(c_66,plain,
% 3.39/1.10 ($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $sum_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 cnf(c_67,plain,
% 3.39/1.10 ($sum_int($product_int(11,a),$product_int(7,b)) = 1),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 cnf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
% 3.39/1.10 ($less_int(-40,$product_int(a,b))),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 cnf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
% 3.39/1.10 ($less_int($product_int(a,b),-6)),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 cnf(c_90,plain,
% 3.39/1.10 ($sum_int($product_int(a,11),$product_int(b,7)) = 1),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_54,c_55,c_65,c_66])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 cnf(c_1125,plain,
% 3.39/1.10 ($sum_int($product_int(a,11),$sum_int($product_int(b,7),X0_3)) = $sum_int(1,X0_3)),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_65])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 cnf(c_5708,plain,
% 3.39/1.10 ($false),
% 3.39/1.10 inference(smt_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1125,c_69,c_68])).
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 3.39/1.10
% 3.39/1.10
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------