TSTP Solution File: ARI640_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI640_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:07:26 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 2.96s 1.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14 % Problem : ARI640_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.3.0.
% 0.09/0.15 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 01:13:42 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.51 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.21/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.96/1.19 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.96/1.19 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 ------ iProver source info
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.96/1.19 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.96/1.19 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 ------ Parsing...
% 2.96/1.19 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.96/1.19 ------ Proving...
% 2.96/1.19 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 clauses 21
% 2.96/1.19 conjectures 0
% 2.96/1.19 EPR 7
% 2.96/1.19 Horn 18
% 2.96/1.19 unary 17
% 2.96/1.19 binary 1
% 2.96/1.19 lits 28
% 2.96/1.19 lits eq 15
% 2.96/1.19 fd_pure 0
% 2.96/1.19 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.96/1.19 fd_cond 0
% 2.96/1.19 fd_pseudo_cond 2
% 2.96/1.19 AC symbols 2
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 ------
% 2.96/1.19 Current options:
% 2.96/1.19 ------
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 ------ Proving...
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f1,axiom,(
% 2.96/1.19 $greater(x,0.0)),
% 2.96/1.19 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hypothesis)).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f2,axiom,(
% 2.96/1.19 $greater(y,0.0)),
% 2.96/1.19 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hypothesis_01)).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f3,axiom,(
% 2.96/1.19 $less(y,1.0)),
% 2.96/1.19 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hypothesis_02)).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f4,axiom,(
% 2.96/1.19 $greater($product(x,y),$sum(x,y))),
% 2.96/1.19 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hypothesis_03)).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f7,plain,(
% 2.96/1.19 $less(0.0,x)),
% 2.96/1.19 inference(theory_normalization,[],[f1])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f8,plain,(
% 2.96/1.19 $less(0.0,y)),
% 2.96/1.19 inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f9,plain,(
% 2.96/1.19 $less($sum(x,y),$product(x,y))),
% 2.96/1.19 inference(theory_normalization,[],[f4])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f10,plain,(
% 2.96/1.19 ( ! [X0 : $real,X1 : $real] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 2.96/1.19 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f11,plain,(
% 2.96/1.19 ( ! [X2 : $real,X0 : $real,X1 : $real] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 2.96/1.19 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f21,plain,(
% 2.96/1.19 ( ! [X0 : $real,X1 : $real] : ($product(X0,X1) = $product(X1,X0)) )),
% 2.96/1.19 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f22,plain,(
% 2.96/1.19 ( ! [X2 : $real,X0 : $real,X1 : $real] : ($product(X0,$product(X1,X2)) = $product($product(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 2.96/1.19 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f28,plain,(
% 2.96/1.19 $less(0.0,x)),
% 2.96/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f29,plain,(
% 2.96/1.19 $less(0.0,y)),
% 2.96/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f30,plain,(
% 2.96/1.19 $less(y,1.0)),
% 2.96/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 tff(f31,plain,(
% 2.96/1.19 $less($sum(x,y),$product(x,y))),
% 2.96/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 cnf(c_53,plain,
% 2.96/1.19 ($product_real($product_real(X0_2,X1_2),X2_2) = $product_real(X0_2,$product_real(X1_2,X2_2))),
% 2.96/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 cnf(c_54,plain,
% 2.96/1.19 ($product_real(X0_2,X1_2) = $product_real(X1_2,X0_2)),
% 2.96/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 cnf(c_64,plain,
% 2.96/1.19 ($sum_real($sum_real(X0_2,X1_2),X2_2) = $sum_real(X0_2,$sum_real(X1_2,X2_2))),
% 2.96/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 cnf(c_65,plain,
% 2.96/1.19 ($sum_real(X0_2,X1_2) = $sum_real(X1_2,X0_2)),
% 2.96/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 cnf(c_66,plain,($less_real(0.0,x)),inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 cnf(c_67,plain,($less_real(0.0,y)),inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 cnf(c_68,plain,($less_real(y,1.0)),inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 cnf(c_69,plain,
% 2.96/1.19 ($less_real($sum_real(x,y),$product_real(x,y))),
% 2.96/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 cnf(c_87,plain,
% 2.96/1.19 ($less_real($sum_real(y,x),$product_real(y,x))),
% 2.96/1.19 inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_53,c_54,c_64,c_65])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 cnf(c_3800,plain,
% 2.96/1.19 ($false),
% 2.96/1.19 inference(smt_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_68,c_67,c_66])).
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.96/1.19
% 2.96/1.19
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------