TSTP Solution File: ARI638_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI638_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:07:26 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 3.69s 0.93s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.07 % Problem : ARI638_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.3.0.
% 0.04/0.07 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.07/0.26 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.26 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.26 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.26 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.26 % DateTime : Fri May 3 00:59:20 EDT 2024
% 0.07/0.26 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.33 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.10/0.33 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.69/0.93 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.69/0.93 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 ------ iProver source info
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.69/0.93 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.69/0.93 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 ------ Parsing...
% 3.69/0.93 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 5 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.69/0.93 ------ Proving...
% 3.69/0.93 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 clauses 23
% 3.69/0.93 conjectures 1
% 3.69/0.93 EPR 6
% 3.69/0.93 Horn 20
% 3.69/0.93 unary 19
% 3.69/0.93 binary 1
% 3.69/0.93 lits 30
% 3.69/0.93 lits eq 16
% 3.69/0.93 fd_pure 0
% 3.69/0.93 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.69/0.93 fd_cond 0
% 3.69/0.93 fd_pseudo_cond 2
% 3.69/0.93 AC symbols 2
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 ------
% 3.69/0.93 Current options:
% 3.69/0.93 ------
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 ------ Proving...
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 tff(f1,axiom,(
% 3.69/0.93 ! [X0 : $real,X1 : $real] : f($sum(X0,X1)) = $product(f(X0),f(X1))),
% 3.69/0.93 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f_feature)).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 tff(f2,axiom,(
% 3.69/0.93 $greater(f($sum(a,b)),2.0)),
% 3.69/0.93 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hypothesis)).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 tff(f3,axiom,(
% 3.69/0.93 $greater(f($sum(c,d)),2.0)),
% 3.69/0.93 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hypothesis_01)).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 tff(f4,conjecture,(
% 3.69/0.93 $greater(f($sum(a,$sum(b,$sum(c,d)))),4.0)),
% 3.69/0.93 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion)).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 tff(f5,negated_conjecture,(
% 3.69/0.93 ~$greater(f($sum(a,$sum(b,$sum(c,d)))),4.0)),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f4])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 tff(f6,plain,(
% 3.69/0.93 $less(2.0,f($sum(a,b)))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 tff(f7,plain,(
% 3.69/0.93 $less(2.0,f($sum(c,d)))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(theory_normalization,[],[f3])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 tff(f8,plain,(
% 3.69/0.93 ~$less(4.0,f($sum(a,$sum(b,$sum(c,d)))))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(theory_normalization,[],[f5])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 tff(f26,plain,(
% 3.69/0.93 ~$less(4.0,f($sum(a,$sum(b,$sum(c,d)))))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(flattening,[],[f8])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 tff(f27,plain,(
% 3.69/0.93 ( ! [X0 : $real,X1 : $real] : (f($sum(X0,X1)) = $product(f(X0),f(X1))) )),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 tff(f28,plain,(
% 3.69/0.93 $less(2.0,f($sum(a,b)))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 tff(f29,plain,(
% 3.69/0.93 $less(2.0,f($sum(c,d)))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 tff(f30,plain,(
% 3.69/0.93 ~$less(4.0,f($sum(a,$sum(b,$sum(c,d)))))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 cnf(c_66,plain,
% 3.69/0.93 ($product_real(f(X0_2),f(X1_2)) = f($sum_real(X0_2,X1_2))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 cnf(c_67,plain,
% 3.69/0.93 ($less_real(2.0,f($sum_real(a,b)))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 cnf(c_68,plain,
% 3.69/0.93 ($less_real(2.0,f($sum_real(c,d)))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 cnf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
% 3.69/0.93 (~$less_real(4.0,f($sum_real(a,$sum_real(b,$sum_real(c,d)))))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 cnf(c_161,plain,
% 3.69/0.93 ($less_real(2.0,$product_real(f(a),f(b)))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_66])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 cnf(c_162,plain,
% 3.69/0.93 (~$less_real(4.0,$product_real(f(a),f($sum_real(b,$sum_real(c,d)))))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_66])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 cnf(c_163,plain,
% 3.69/0.93 ($less_real(2.0,$product_real(f(c),f(d)))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_66])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 cnf(c_164,plain,
% 3.69/0.93 (~$less_real(4.0,$product_real(f(a),$product_real(f(b),$product_real(f(c),f(d)))))),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_162,c_66])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 cnf(c_2452,plain,
% 3.69/0.93 ($false),
% 3.69/0.93 inference(smt_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_164,c_163,c_161])).
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 3.69/0.93
% 3.69/0.93
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------