TSTP Solution File: ARI618_1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : ARI618_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:48:15 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.71s 0.88s
% Output   : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   8 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   92 (  48   ~;  22   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  102 (  50 atm;  22 fun;   0 num;  30 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    1 (   1   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (  27   !;   3   ?;  30   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_0,type,
    f: $int > $int ).

tff(func_def_5,type,
    sK0: $int ).

tff(f276,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f264,f259]) ).

tff(f259,plain,
    sK0 = f(sK0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f258,f25]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] :
      ( $less(X0,f(X0))
      | ( f(X0) = X0 ) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f21,f11]) ).

tff(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( $less(X1,X0)
      | $less(X0,X1)
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_144,[]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    ! [X1: $int] : ~ $less(f(X1),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ( ( f(sK0) != f(f(sK0)) )
    & ! [X1: $int] :
        ( ( ~ $less($uminus(X1),f(X1))
          | ~ $less(X1,f(X1)) )
        & ~ $less(f(X1),$uminus(X1))
        & ~ $less(f(X1),X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f18,f19]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $int] : ( f(X0) != f(f(X0)) )
   => ( f(sK0) != f(f(sK0)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $int] : ( f(X0) != f(f(X0)) )
    & ! [X1: $int] :
        ( ( ~ $less($uminus(X1),f(X1))
          | ~ $less(X1,f(X1)) )
        & ~ $less(f(X1),$uminus(X1))
        & ~ $less(f(X1),X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ( ? [X1: $int] : ( f(X1) != f(f(X1)) )
    & ! [X0: $int] :
        ( ( ~ $less($uminus(X0),f(X0))
          | ~ $less(X0,f(X0)) )
        & ~ $less(f(X0),$uminus(X0))
        & ~ $less(f(X0),X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: $int] :
          ( ( ~ $less($uminus(X0),f(X0))
            | ~ $less(X0,f(X0)) )
          & ~ $less(f(X0),$uminus(X0))
          & ~ $less(f(X0),X0) )
     => ! [X1: $int] : ( f(X1) = f(f(X1)) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: $int] :
          ( ( ~ $less($uminus(X0),f(X0))
            | ~ $less(X0,f(X0)) )
          & ~ $less(f(X0),$uminus(X0))
          & ~ $less(f(X0),X0) )
     => ! [X0: $int] : ( f(X0) = f(f(X0)) ) ),
    inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0: $int] :
          ( ( $lesseq(f(X0),$uminus(X0))
            | $lesseq(f(X0),X0) )
          & $lesseq($uminus(X0),f(X0))
          & $lesseq(X0,f(X0)) )
     => ! [X0: $int] : ( f(X0) = f(f(X0)) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X0: $int] :
        ( ( $lesseq(f(X0),$uminus(X0))
          | $lesseq(f(X0),X0) )
        & $lesseq($uminus(X0),f(X0))
        & $lesseq(X0,f(X0)) )
   => ! [X0: $int] : ( f(X0) = f(f(X0)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absolute_value_idempotent) ).

tff(f258,plain,
    ~ $less(sK0,f(sK0)),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f245]) ).

tff(f245,plain,
    ( ( f(sK0) != f(sK0) )
    | ~ $less(sK0,f(sK0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f24,f184]) ).

tff(f184,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] :
      ( ( f(X0) = f(f(X0)) )
      | ~ $less(X0,f(X0)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f68,f25]) ).

tff(f68,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] :
      ( ~ $less(f(X0),f(f(X0)))
      | ~ $less(X0,f(X0)) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f63,f10]) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( $less(X0,X2)
      | ~ $less(X1,X2)
      | ~ $less(X0,X1) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_143,[]) ).

tff(f63,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] :
      ( ~ $less(X0,f(f(X0)))
      | ~ $less(f(X0),f(f(X0)))
      | ~ $less(X0,f(X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f23,f58]) ).

tff(f58,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] :
      ( ( $uminus(f(X0)) = X0 )
      | ~ $less(X0,f(X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f14,f50]) ).

tff(f50,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] :
      ( ( f(X0) = $uminus(X0) )
      | ~ $less(X0,f(X0)) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f46,f22]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    ! [X1: $int] : ~ $less(f(X1),$uminus(X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f46,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] :
      ( ~ $less(X0,f(X0))
      | $less(f(X0),$uminus(X0))
      | ( f(X0) = $uminus(X0) ) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f23,f11]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] : ( $uminus($uminus(X0)) = X0 ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_148,[]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    ! [X1: $int] :
      ( ~ $less($uminus(X1),f(X1))
      | ~ $less(X1,f(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    f(sK0) != f(f(sK0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f264,plain,
    sK0 != f(sK0),
    inference(superposition,[],[f24,f259]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : ARI618_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 12:55:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.37  This is a TF0_THM_EQU_ARI problem
% 0.15/0.37  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/0.87  % (32126)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (32128)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (32127)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (32129)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (32130)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (32131)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (32133)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (32132)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.71/0.87  % (32129)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (32129)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.87  % (32129)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.71/0.87  % (32129)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.71/0.87  
% 0.71/0.87  % (32129)Memory used [KB]: 981
% 0.71/0.87  % (32129)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.71/0.87  % (32129)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.71/0.87  % (32129)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.87  % (32129)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.88  % (32134)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/55Mi)
% 0.71/0.88  % (32131)First to succeed.
% 0.71/0.88  % (32131)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-32125"
% 0.71/0.88  % (32131)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.71/0.88  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.71/0.88  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.71/0.88  % (32131)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.88  % (32131)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.71/0.88  % (32131)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.71/0.88  
% 0.71/0.88  % (32131)Memory used [KB]: 1068
% 0.71/0.88  % (32131)Time elapsed: 0.011 s
% 0.71/0.88  % (32131)Instructions burned: 16 (million)
% 0.71/0.88  % (32125)Success in time 0.505 s
% 0.71/0.88  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------