TSTP Solution File: ARI610_1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : ARI610_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:48:13 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.62s 0.81s
% Output   : Refutation 0.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   9 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   30 (  11   ~;   6   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   87 (  34 atm;  22 fun;  11 num;  20 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    1 (   1   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (  20   !;   0   ?;  20   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_0,type,
    f: $int > $int ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    a: $int ).

tff(func_def_2,type,
    b: $int ).

tff(f89,plain,
    $false,
    inference(evaluation,[],[f88]) ).

tff(f88,plain,
    $less(0,0),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f73,f8]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] : ( 0 = $sum(X0,$uminus(X0)) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_140,[]) ).

tff(f73,plain,
    $less($sum(b,$uminus(b)),0),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f56,f33,f10]) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( ~ $less(X1,X2)
      | ~ $less(X0,X1)
      | $less(X0,X2) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_143,[]) ).

tff(f33,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] : $less($sum(b,X0),$sum(a,X0)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f29,f12]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( $less($sum(X0,X2),$sum(X1,X2))
      | ~ $less(X0,X1) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_145,[]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    $less(b,a),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f19,f18]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( ~ $less(f(X1),f(X0))
      | $less(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ( $less(f($sum(a,$uminus(b))),f(0))
    & $less(f(b),f(a))
    & ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
        ( ~ $less(f(X1),f(X0))
        | $less(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ( $less(f($sum(a,$uminus(b))),f(0))
    & $less(f(b),f(a))
    & ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
        ( ~ $less(f(X1),f(X0))
        | $less(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ( $less(f(b),f(a))
        & ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
            ( ~ $less(X1,X0)
           => ~ $less(f(X1),f(X0)) ) )
     => ~ $less(f($sum(a,$uminus(b))),f(0)) ),
    inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( $less(f(b),f(a))
        & ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
            ( $lesseq(X0,X1)
           => $lesseq(f(X0),f(X1)) ) )
     => $lesseq(f(0),f($sum(a,$uminus(b)))) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( $less(f(b),f(a))
      & ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
          ( $lesseq(X0,X1)
         => $lesseq(f(X0),f(X1)) ) )
   => $lesseq(f(0),f($sum(a,$uminus(b)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f_mon_implies_f_a_b_2) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    $less(f(b),f(a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f56,plain,
    $less($sum(a,$uminus(b)),0),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f20,f18]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    $less(f($sum(a,$uminus(b))),f(0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : ARI610_1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.1.0.
% 0.14/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 12:59:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.36  This is a TF0_THM_NEQ_ARI problem
% 0.22/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.62/0.80  % (4846)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.62/0.80  % (4839)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.80  % (4841)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.62/0.80  % (4842)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.62/0.80  % (4843)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.80  % (4840)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.62/0.80  % (4844)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.62/0.80  % (4845)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.62/0.80  % (4845)First to succeed.
% 0.62/0.80  % (4842)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.80  % (4845)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-4752"
% 0.62/0.81  % (4845)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.62/0.81  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.62/0.81  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.62/0.81  % (4845)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.81  % (4845)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.62/0.81  % (4845)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.62/0.81  
% 0.62/0.81  % (4845)Memory used [KB]: 1048
% 0.62/0.81  % (4845)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.62/0.81  % (4845)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.62/0.81  % (4752)Success in time 0.432 s
% 0.62/0.81  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------