TSTP Solution File: ARI590_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI590_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:07:19 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 2.29s 1.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : ARI590_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 01:21:39 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.29/1.20 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.29/1.20 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 ------ iProver source info
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.29/1.20 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.29/1.20 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 ------ Parsing...
% 2.29/1.20 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.29/1.20 ------ Proving...
% 2.29/1.20 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 clauses 13
% 2.29/1.20 conjectures 1
% 2.29/1.20 EPR 5
% 2.29/1.20 Horn 11
% 2.29/1.20 unary 8
% 2.29/1.20 binary 3
% 2.29/1.20 lits 20
% 2.29/1.20 lits eq 8
% 2.29/1.20 fd_pure 0
% 2.29/1.20 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.29/1.20 fd_cond 1
% 2.29/1.20 fd_pseudo_cond 1
% 2.29/1.20 AC symbols 1
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 ------
% 2.29/1.20 Current options:
% 2.29/1.20 ------
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 ------ Proving...
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 2.29/1.20 ! [X0 : $int] : ? [X1 : $int] : (X0 != X1 & $less(0,X1))),
% 2.29/1.20 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',exists_pos_X_noteq_Y)).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 2.29/1.20 ~! [X0 : $int] : ? [X1 : $int] : (X0 != X1 & $less(0,X1))),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 tff(f3,plain,(
% 2.29/1.20 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 2.29/1.20 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 tff(f5,plain,(
% 2.29/1.20 ( ! [X0 : $int] : ($sum(X0,0) = X0) )),
% 2.29/1.20 introduced(theory_axiom_140,[])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 tff(f9,plain,(
% 2.29/1.20 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : (~$less(X0,X1) | ~$less(X1,X2) | $less(X0,X2)) )),
% 2.29/1.20 introduced(theory_axiom_146,[])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 tff(f12,plain,(
% 2.29/1.20 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($less(X0,X1) | $less(X1,$sum(X0,1))) )),
% 2.29/1.20 introduced(theory_axiom_150,[])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 tff(f14,plain,(
% 2.29/1.20 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : (~$less(X0,X1) | ~$less(X1,$sum(X0,1))) )),
% 2.29/1.20 introduced(theory_axiom_164,[])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 tff(f15,plain,(
% 2.29/1.20 ? [X0 : $int] : ! [X1 : $int] : (X0 = X1 | ~$less(0,X1))),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 tff(f16,plain,(
% 2.29/1.20 ? [X0 : $int] : ! [X1 : $int] : (X0 = X1 | ~$less(0,X1)) => ! [X1 : $int] : (sK0 = X1 | ~$less(0,X1))),
% 2.29/1.20 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 tff(f17,plain,(
% 2.29/1.20 ! [X1 : $int] : (sK0 = X1 | ~$less(0,X1))),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f15,f16])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 tff(f18,plain,(
% 2.29/1.20 ( ! [X1 : $int] : (sK0 = X1 | ~$less(0,X1)) )),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_49,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 (~$less_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,1))|~$less_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_51,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 ($less_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,1))|$less_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_54,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 (~$less_int(X0_3,X1_3)|~$less_int(X1_3,X2_3)|$less_int(X0_3,X2_3)),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_58,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 ($sum_int(X0_3,0) = X0_3),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_60,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 ($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $sum_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
% 2.29/1.20 (~$less_int(0,X0_3)|X0_3 = sK0),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_62,plain,($less_int(0,1)),theory(arith)).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_277,plain,(X0_3 = X0_3),theory(equality)).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_281,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 (X0_3 != X1_3|X2_3 != X3_3|~$less_int(X1_3,X3_3)|$less_int(X0_3,X2_3)),
% 2.29/1.20 theory(equality)).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_507,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 (sK0 = 1),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_61])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_508,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 (~$less_int(0,X0_3)|X0_3 = 1),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_507])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_527,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 ($sum_int(X0_3,1) = 1|$less_int(X0_3,0)),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_508])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_537,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 ($sum_int(0,X0_3) = X0_3),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_58])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_591,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 (~$less_int(X0_3,1)|~$less_int(0,X0_3)),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_537,c_49])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_604,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 (X0_3 = 0|$less_int(X0_3,0)),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_527])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_745,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 (~$less_int(X0_3,0)|~$less_int(0,1)|$less_int(X0_3,1)),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_54])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_748,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 (X0_3 != 0|X1_3 != 1|~$less_int(0,1)|$less_int(X0_3,X1_3)),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_281])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_798,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 (X0_3 != 0|1 != 1|~$less_int(0,1)|$less_int(X0_3,1)),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_748])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_799,plain,(1 = 1),inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_277])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_830,negated_conjecture,
% 2.29/1.20 (~$less_int(0,X0_3)),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(global_subsumption_just,
% 2.29/1.20 [status(thm)],
% 2.29/1.20 [c_61,c_62,c_591,c_604,c_745,c_798,c_799])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 cnf(c_877,plain,
% 2.29/1.20 ($false),
% 2.29/1.20 inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_830])).
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.29/1.20
% 2.29/1.20
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------