TSTP Solution File: ARI543_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI543_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:07:12 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.80s 1.09s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : ARI543_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.10/0.11 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Fri May 3 01:11:05 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.44 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.16/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.80/1.09 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/1.09 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 ------ iProver source info
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.80/1.09 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.80/1.09 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 ------ Parsing...
% 0.80/1.09 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.80/1.09 $less($product(-3,$difference(14,69)),$sum($uminus(76),271))),
% 0.80/1.09 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',int_combined_problem_7)).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.80/1.09 ~$less($product(-3,$difference(14,69)),$sum($uminus(76),271))),
% 0.80/1.09 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 tff(f3,plain,(
% 0.80/1.09 ~$less($product(-3,$sum(14,$uminus(69))),$sum($uminus(76),271))),
% 0.80/1.09 inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 tff(f4,plain,(
% 0.80/1.09 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 0.80/1.09 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 tff(f5,plain,(
% 0.80/1.09 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 0.80/1.09 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 tff(f15,plain,(
% 0.80/1.09 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($product(X0,X1) = $product(X1,X0)) )),
% 0.80/1.09 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 tff(f16,plain,(
% 0.80/1.09 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($product(X0,$product(X1,X2)) = $product($product(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 0.80/1.09 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 tff(f22,plain,(
% 0.80/1.09 ~$less($product(-3,$sum(14,$uminus(69))),$sum($uminus(76),271))),
% 0.80/1.09 inference(flattening,[],[f3])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 tff(f23,plain,(
% 0.80/1.09 ~$less($product(-3,$sum(14,$uminus(69))),$sum($uminus(76),271))),
% 0.80/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 cnf(c_54,plain,
% 0.80/1.09 ($product_int($product_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $product_int(X0_3,$product_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 0.80/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 cnf(c_55,plain,
% 0.80/1.09 ($product_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $product_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 0.80/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 cnf(c_65,plain,
% 0.80/1.09 ($sum_int($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 0.80/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 cnf(c_66,plain,
% 0.80/1.09 ($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $sum_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 0.80/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
% 0.80/1.09 (~$less_int($product_int(-3,$sum_int(14,$uminus_int(69))),$sum_int($uminus_int(76),271))),
% 0.80/1.09 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 cnf(c_89,negated_conjecture,
% 0.80/1.09 (~$less_int($product_int(-3,$sum_int(14,$uminus_int(69))),$sum_int(271,$uminus_int(76)))),
% 0.80/1.09 inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_54,c_55,c_65,c_66])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 cnf(c_219,plain,
% 0.80/1.09 ($false),
% 0.80/1.09 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_89])).
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/1.09
% 0.80/1.09
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------