TSTP Solution File: ARI526_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI526_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:07:10 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 1.23s 1.10s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10 % Problem : ARI526_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Fri May 3 01:12:35 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.23/1.10 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.23/1.10 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 ------ iProver source info
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.23/1.10 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.23/1.10 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 ------ Parsing...
% 1.23/1.10 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 ------ Preprocessing...
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.23/1.10 $to_int($difference($to_rat($sum(4.05,3.6)),53/20)) = 5),
% 1.23/1.10 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mixed_types_problem_31)).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.23/1.10 ~$to_int($difference($to_rat($sum(4.05,3.6)),53/20)) = 5),
% 1.23/1.10 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 tff(f3,plain,(
% 1.23/1.10 ~5 = $to_int($sum($to_rat($sum(4.05,3.6)),$uminus(53/20)))),
% 1.23/1.10 inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 tff(f4,plain,(
% 1.23/1.10 ( ! [X0 : $rat,X1 : $rat] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 1.23/1.10 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 tff(f5,plain,(
% 1.23/1.10 ( ! [X2 : $rat,X0 : $rat,X1 : $rat] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 1.23/1.10 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 tff(f15,plain,(
% 1.23/1.10 ( ! [X0 : $real,X1 : $real] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 1.23/1.10 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 tff(f16,plain,(
% 1.23/1.10 ( ! [X2 : $real,X0 : $real,X1 : $real] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 1.23/1.10 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 tff(f26,plain,(
% 1.23/1.10 5 != $to_int($sum($to_rat($sum(4.05,3.6)),$uminus(53/20)))),
% 1.23/1.10 inference(flattening,[],[f3])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 tff(f27,plain,(
% 1.23/1.10 5 != $to_int($sum($to_rat($sum(4.05,3.6)),$uminus(53/20)))),
% 1.23/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 cnf(c_58,plain,
% 1.23/1.10 ($sum_real($sum_real(X0_2,X1_2),X2_2) = $sum_real(X0_2,$sum_real(X1_2,X2_2))),
% 1.23/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 cnf(c_59,plain,
% 1.23/1.10 ($sum_real(X0_2,X1_2) = $sum_real(X1_2,X0_2)),
% 1.23/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 cnf(c_69,plain,
% 1.23/1.10 ($sum_rat($sum_rat(X0_4,X1_4),X2_4) = $sum_rat(X0_4,$sum_rat(X1_4,X2_4))),
% 1.23/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 cnf(c_70,plain,
% 1.23/1.10 ($sum_rat(X0_4,X1_4) = $sum_rat(X1_4,X0_4)),
% 1.23/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 cnf(c_71,negated_conjecture,
% 1.23/1.10 ($to_int_rat($sum_rat($to_rat_real($sum_real(4.05,3.6)),$uminus_rat(53/20))) != 5),
% 1.23/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 cnf(c_93,plain,
% 1.23/1.10 (iProver_spec_dis_eq_int($to_int_rat($sum_rat($to_rat_real($sum_real(4.05,3.6)),$uminus_rat(53/20))),5)),
% 1.23/1.10 inference(dis_equality_elim,[status(thm)],[c_71])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 cnf(c_94,plain,(~iProver_spec_dis_eq_int(X0_3,X0_3)),theory(irreflexivity)).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 cnf(c_96,plain,
% 1.23/1.10 (iProver_spec_dis_eq_int($to_int_rat($sum_rat($uminus_rat(53/20),$to_rat_real($sum_real(4.05,3.6)))),5)),
% 1.23/1.10 inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_93,c_69,c_70,c_58,c_59])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 cnf(c_181,plain,
% 1.23/1.10 (iProver_spec_dis_eq_int(5,5)),
% 1.23/1.10 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_96])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 cnf(c_182,plain,
% 1.23/1.10 ($false),
% 1.23/1.10 inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_181,c_94])).
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 1.23/1.10
% 1.23/1.10
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------