TSTP Solution File: ARI453_1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : ARI453_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:48:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 4.34s 1.30s
% Output : Proof 7.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : ARI453_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:20:53 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.45/0.61 ________ _____
% 0.45/0.61 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.45/0.61 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.45/0.61 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.45/0.61 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.45/0.61
% 0.45/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.45/0.61 (2023-06-19)
% 0.45/0.61
% 0.45/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.45/0.61 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.45/0.61 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.45/0.61 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.45/0.61
% 0.45/0.61 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.45/0.61
% 0.45/0.62 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.45/0.63 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.45/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.45/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.45/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.45/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.45/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.45/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.45/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.82/0.91 Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.82/0.91 Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.82/0.91 Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.82/0.91 Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.82/0.91 Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.82/0.91 Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.82/0.91 Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.82/0.97 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 1.82/0.97 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.41/1.02 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.41/1.02 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.41/1.02 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.41/1.02 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.41/1.02 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.34/1.26 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.34/1.30 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.34/1.30 Prover 6: proved (654ms)
% 4.34/1.30 Prover 2: proved (663ms)
% 4.34/1.30
% 4.34/1.30 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.34/1.30
% 4.34/1.31
% 4.34/1.31 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.34/1.31
% 4.34/1.31 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.34/1.31 Prover 0: stopped
% 4.34/1.32 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 4.34/1.32 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 4.34/1.32 Prover 8: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 4.34/1.32 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.34/1.32 Prover 3: stopped
% 4.34/1.32 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 4.34/1.32 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 4.34/1.32 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 4.34/1.33 Prover 10: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 4.34/1.33 Prover 11: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 4.34/1.33 Prover 7: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 4.34/1.34 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.34/1.34 Prover 5: stopped
% 4.34/1.35 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 4.34/1.35 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 4.34/1.35 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 4.34/1.36 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 4.99/1.36 Prover 13: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 4.99/1.37 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 5.61/1.49 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.61/1.51 Prover 1: Found proof (size 1)
% 5.61/1.51 Prover 1: proved (871ms)
% 6.20/1.52 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.20/1.52 Prover 4: stopped
% 6.20/1.55 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.20/1.55 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.20/1.55 Prover 8: stopped
% 6.20/1.55 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.20/1.56 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.20/1.56 Prover 13: stopped
% 6.65/1.60 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.65/1.60 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.65/1.60 Prover 7: stopped
% 6.65/1.61 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.65/1.61 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.65/1.61 Prover 10: stopped
% 7.15/1.66 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.15/1.66 Prover 11: stopped
% 7.15/1.66
% 7.15/1.66 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.15/1.66
% 7.15/1.67 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.15/1.67 Assumptions after simplification:
% 7.15/1.67 ---------------------------------
% 7.15/1.67
% 7.15/1.67 (real_product_problem_18)
% 7.15/1.67 $false
% 7.15/1.67
% 7.15/1.67 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 7.15/1.67 ---------------------------------
% 7.15/1.67
% 7.15/1.67 Begin of proof
% 7.15/1.67 |
% 7.15/1.67 | CLOSE: (real_product_problem_18) is inconsistent.
% 7.15/1.67 |
% 7.15/1.67 End of proof
% 7.15/1.67 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.15/1.67
% 7.15/1.67 1058ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------