TSTP Solution File: ARI430_1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : ARI430_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:48:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  10 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   7   ~;   0   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   53 (   0 atm;  17 fun;  31 num;   5 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (   3 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   3   !;   2   ?;   5   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_8,type,
    sK0: $real ).

tff(func_def_9,type,
    sF1: $real ).

tff(func_def_10,type,
    sF2: $real ).

tff(f27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f19,f26]) ).

tff(f26,plain,
    14.25 = sK0,
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f22,f25]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    14.25 = sF2,
    inference(evaluation,[],[f24]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    $sum(23.76,-9.51) = sF2,
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f21,f23]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    sF1 = -9.51,
    inference(evaluation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    sF1 = $uminus(9.51),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    $sum(23.76,sF1) = sF2,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    sF2 = sK0,
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f18,f21,f20]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    $sum(23.76,$uminus(9.51)) = sK0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ( ( 14.25 != sK0 )
    & ( $sum(23.76,$uminus(9.51)) = sK0 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f15,f16]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $real] :
        ( ( 14.25 != X0 )
        & ( $sum(23.76,$uminus(9.51)) = X0 ) )
   => ( ( 14.25 != sK0 )
      & ( $sum(23.76,$uminus(9.51)) = sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ? [X0: $real] :
      ( ( 14.25 != X0 )
      & ( $sum(23.76,$uminus(9.51)) = X0 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f3,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $real] :
        ( ( $sum(23.76,$uminus(9.51)) = X0 )
       => ( 14.25 = X0 ) ),
    inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $real] :
        ( ( $difference(23.76,9.51) = X0 )
       => ( 14.25 = X0 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $real] :
      ( ( $difference(23.76,9.51) = X0 )
     => ( 14.25 = X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',real_difference_problem_6) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    14.25 != sK0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : ARI430=1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 15:41:03 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.50  % (24978)ott+10_1:32_abs=on:br=off:urr=ec_only:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/50Mi)
% 0.19/0.50  % (24984)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/7Mi)
% 0.19/0.50  % (24992)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/75Mi)
% 0.19/0.50  % (24990)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/99Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (24990)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.51  % (24992)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.19/0.51  % (24990)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.51  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51  % (24990)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (24990)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.51  % (24990)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.51  % (24990)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  % (24990)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.19/0.51  % (24990)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.51  % (24990)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.51  % (24990)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (24990)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (24976)Success in time 0.162 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------