TSTP Solution File: ARI341_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI341_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:06:46 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.99s 1.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : ARI341_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 00:55:04 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.99/1.17 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/1.17 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 ------ iProver source info
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.99/1.17 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.99/1.17 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 ------ Parsing...
% 0.99/1.17 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.99/1.17 $less($product(-2/5,$difference(145/2,569/5)),$sum($uminus(76/25),271/10))),
% 0.99/1.17 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rat_combined_problem_7)).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.99/1.17 ~$less($product(-2/5,$difference(145/2,569/5)),$sum($uminus(76/25),271/10))),
% 0.99/1.17 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 tff(f3,plain,(
% 0.99/1.17 ~$less($product(-2/5,$sum(145/2,$uminus(569/5))),$sum($uminus(76/25),271/10))),
% 0.99/1.17 inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 tff(f4,plain,(
% 0.99/1.17 ( ! [X0 : $rat,X1 : $rat] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 0.99/1.17 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 tff(f5,plain,(
% 0.99/1.17 ( ! [X2 : $rat,X0 : $rat,X1 : $rat] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 0.99/1.17 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 tff(f15,plain,(
% 0.99/1.17 ( ! [X0 : $rat,X1 : $rat] : ($product(X0,X1) = $product(X1,X0)) )),
% 0.99/1.17 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 tff(f16,plain,(
% 0.99/1.17 ( ! [X2 : $rat,X0 : $rat,X1 : $rat] : ($product(X0,$product(X1,X2)) = $product($product(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 0.99/1.17 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 tff(f21,plain,(
% 0.99/1.17 ~$less($product(-2/5,$sum(145/2,$uminus(569/5))),$sum($uminus(76/25),271/10))),
% 0.99/1.17 inference(flattening,[],[f3])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 tff(f22,plain,(
% 0.99/1.17 ~$less($product(-2/5,$sum(145/2,$uminus(569/5))),$sum($uminus(76/25),271/10))),
% 0.99/1.17 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 cnf(c_53,plain,
% 0.99/1.17 ($product_rat($product_rat(X0_4,X1_4),X2_4) = $product_rat(X0_4,$product_rat(X1_4,X2_4))),
% 0.99/1.17 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 cnf(c_54,plain,
% 0.99/1.17 ($product_rat(X0_4,X1_4) = $product_rat(X1_4,X0_4)),
% 0.99/1.17 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 cnf(c_64,plain,
% 0.99/1.17 ($sum_rat($sum_rat(X0_4,X1_4),X2_4) = $sum_rat(X0_4,$sum_rat(X1_4,X2_4))),
% 0.99/1.17 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 cnf(c_65,plain,
% 0.99/1.17 ($sum_rat(X0_4,X1_4) = $sum_rat(X1_4,X0_4)),
% 0.99/1.17 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
% 0.99/1.17 (~$less_rat($product_rat(-2/5,$sum_rat(145/2,$uminus_rat(569/5))),$sum_rat($uminus_rat(76/25),271/10))),
% 0.99/1.17 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 cnf(c_82,negated_conjecture,
% 0.99/1.17 (~$less_rat($product_rat(-2/5,$sum_rat(145/2,$uminus_rat(569/5))),$sum_rat(271/10,$uminus_rat(76/25)))),
% 0.99/1.17 inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_53,c_54,c_64,c_65])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 cnf(c_150,plain,
% 0.99/1.17 ($false),
% 0.99/1.17 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_82])).
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/1.17
% 0.99/1.17
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------