TSTP Solution File: ARI340_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI340_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:06:46 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 2.79s 1.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : ARI340_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 01:18:16 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.79/1.18 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.79/1.18 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 ------ iProver source info
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.79/1.18 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.79/1.18 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 ------ Parsing...
% 2.79/1.18 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 2 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.79/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 2.79/1.18 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 clauses 12
% 2.79/1.18 conjectures 1
% 2.79/1.18 EPR 5
% 2.79/1.18 Horn 10
% 2.79/1.18 unary 9
% 2.79/1.18 binary 1
% 2.79/1.18 lits 17
% 2.79/1.18 lits eq 8
% 2.79/1.18 fd_pure 0
% 2.79/1.18 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.79/1.18 fd_cond 0
% 2.79/1.18 fd_pseudo_cond 1
% 2.79/1.18 AC symbols 1
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 ------
% 2.79/1.18 Current options:
% 2.79/1.18 ------
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 2.79/1.18 ! [X0 : $rat] : ($sum(29/10,24/5) = X0 => $less(15/2,X0))),
% 2.79/1.18 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rat_combined_problem_6)).
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 2.79/1.18 ~! [X0 : $rat] : ($sum(29/10,24/5) = X0 => $less(15/2,X0))),
% 2.79/1.18 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 tff(f14,plain,(
% 2.79/1.18 ? [X0 : $rat] : (~$less(15/2,X0) & $sum(29/10,24/5) = X0)),
% 2.79/1.18 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2])).
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 tff(f15,plain,(
% 2.79/1.18 ? [X0 : $rat] : (~$less(15/2,X0) & $sum(29/10,24/5) = X0) => (~$less(15/2,sK0) & $sum(29/10,24/5) = sK0)),
% 2.79/1.18 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 tff(f16,plain,(
% 2.79/1.18 ~$less(15/2,sK0) & $sum(29/10,24/5) = sK0),
% 2.79/1.18 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f14,f15])).
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 tff(f17,plain,(
% 2.79/1.18 $sum(29/10,24/5) = sK0),
% 2.79/1.18 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 tff(f18,plain,(
% 2.79/1.18 ~$less(15/2,sK0)),
% 2.79/1.18 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
% 2.79/1.18 (~$less_rat(15/2,sK0)),
% 2.79/1.18 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18])).
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
% 2.79/1.18 ($sum_rat(29/10,24/5) = sK0),
% 2.79/1.18 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17])).
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 cnf(c_109,plain,
% 2.79/1.18 (sK0 = 77/10),
% 2.79/1.18 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_61])).
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 cnf(c_6651,plain,
% 2.79/1.18 ($false),
% 2.79/1.18 inference(smt_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_60])).
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.79/1.18
% 2.79/1.18
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------