TSTP Solution File: ARI298_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI298_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:06:43 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.46s 1.15s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : ARI298_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 01:02:02 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ iProver source info
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.46/1.15 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.46/1.15 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Parsing...
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.46/1.15 ! [X0 : $rat] : ($product(5/8,X0) = 1/4 => 2/5 = X0)),
% 0.46/1.15 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rat_product_problem_15)).
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.46/1.15 ~! [X0 : $rat] : ($product(5/8,X0) = 1/4 => 2/5 = X0)),
% 0.46/1.15 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 tff(f3,plain,(
% 0.46/1.15 ( ! [X0 : $rat,X1 : $rat] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 0.46/1.15 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 tff(f4,plain,(
% 0.46/1.15 ( ! [X2 : $rat,X0 : $rat,X1 : $rat] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 0.46/1.16 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 tff(f14,plain,(
% 0.46/1.16 ( ! [X0 : $rat,X1 : $rat] : ($product(X0,X1) = $product(X1,X0)) )),
% 0.46/1.16 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 tff(f15,plain,(
% 0.46/1.16 ( ! [X2 : $rat,X0 : $rat,X1 : $rat] : ($product(X0,$product(X1,X2)) = $product($product(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 0.46/1.16 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 tff(f20,plain,(
% 0.46/1.16 ? [X0 : $rat] : (2/5 != X0 & $product(5/8,X0) = 1/4)),
% 0.46/1.16 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 tff(f21,plain,(
% 0.46/1.16 ? [X0 : $rat] : (2/5 != X0 & $product(5/8,X0) = 1/4) => (2/5 != sK0 & 1/4 = $product(5/8,sK0))),
% 0.46/1.16 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 tff(f22,plain,(
% 0.46/1.16 2/5 != sK0 & 1/4 = $product(5/8,sK0)),
% 0.46/1.16 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f20,f21])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 tff(f23,plain,(
% 0.46/1.16 1/4 = $product(5/8,sK0)),
% 0.46/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 tff(f24,plain,(
% 0.46/1.16 2/5 != sK0),
% 0.46/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 cnf(c_53,plain,
% 0.46/1.16 ($product_rat($product_rat(X0_4,X1_4),X2_4) = $product_rat(X0_4,$product_rat(X1_4,X2_4))),
% 0.46/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 cnf(c_54,plain,
% 0.46/1.16 ($product_rat(X0_4,X1_4) = $product_rat(X1_4,X0_4)),
% 0.46/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 cnf(c_64,plain,
% 0.46/1.16 ($sum_rat($sum_rat(X0_4,X1_4),X2_4) = $sum_rat(X0_4,$sum_rat(X1_4,X2_4))),
% 0.46/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 cnf(c_65,plain,
% 0.46/1.16 ($sum_rat(X0_4,X1_4) = $sum_rat(X1_4,X0_4)),
% 0.46/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
% 0.46/1.16 (sK0 != 2/5),
% 0.46/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
% 0.46/1.16 ($product_rat(5/8,sK0) = 1/4),
% 0.46/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 cnf(c_83,negated_conjecture,
% 0.46/1.16 ($product_rat(sK0,5/8) = 1/4),
% 0.46/1.16 inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_53,c_54,c_64,c_65])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 cnf(c_138,plain,
% 0.46/1.16 (sK0 = 2/5),
% 0.46/1.16 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_83])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 cnf(c_139,plain,
% 0.46/1.16 ($false),
% 0.46/1.16 inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_66])).
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.16
% 0.46/1.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------