TSTP Solution File: ARI297_1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : ARI297_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 02:06:43 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.71s 1.09s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : ARI297_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime : Fri May  3 00:57:49 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.40  Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.15/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.71/1.09  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/1.09  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  ------  iProver source info
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.71/1.09  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.71/1.09  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  ------ Parsing...
% 0.71/1.09  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.71/1.09    ! [X0 : $rat] : ($product(X0,2/5) = 1/4 => 5/8 = X0)),
% 0.71/1.09    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rat_product_problem_14)).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.71/1.09    ~! [X0 : $rat] : ($product(X0,2/5) = 1/4 => 5/8 = X0)),
% 0.71/1.09    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  tff(f20,plain,(
% 0.71/1.09    ? [X0 : $rat] : (5/8 != X0 & $product(X0,2/5) = 1/4)),
% 0.71/1.09    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2])).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  tff(f21,plain,(
% 0.71/1.09    ? [X0 : $rat] : (5/8 != X0 & $product(X0,2/5) = 1/4) => (5/8 != sK0 & 1/4 = $product(sK0,2/5))),
% 0.71/1.09    introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  tff(f22,plain,(
% 0.71/1.09    5/8 != sK0 & 1/4 = $product(sK0,2/5)),
% 0.71/1.09    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f20,f21])).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  tff(f23,plain,(
% 0.71/1.09    1/4 = $product(sK0,2/5)),
% 0.71/1.09    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22])).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  tff(f24,plain,(
% 0.71/1.09    5/8 != sK0),
% 0.71/1.09    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22])).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
% 0.71/1.09      (sK0 != 5/8),
% 0.71/1.09      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24])).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
% 0.71/1.09      ($product_rat(sK0,2/5) = 1/4),
% 0.71/1.09      inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23])).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  cnf(c_137,plain,
% 0.71/1.09      (sK0 = 5/8),
% 0.71/1.09      inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_67])).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  cnf(c_138,plain,
% 0.71/1.09      ($false),
% 0.71/1.09      inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_66])).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------