TSTP Solution File: ARI259_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI259_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:06:37 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.73s 1.10s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : ARI259_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Fri May 3 01:14:05 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.42 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.17/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.73/1.10 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.73/1.10 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 ------ iProver source info
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.73/1.10 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.73/1.10 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 ------ Parsing...
% 0.73/1.10 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.73/1.10 ! [X0 : $rat] : ($sum(17/4,X0) = 10/1 => 23/4 = X0)),
% 0.73/1.10 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rat_sum_problem_14)).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.73/1.10 ~! [X0 : $rat] : ($sum(17/4,X0) = 10/1 => 23/4 = X0)),
% 0.73/1.10 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 tff(f3,plain,(
% 0.73/1.10 ( ! [X0 : $rat,X1 : $rat] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 0.73/1.10 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 tff(f4,plain,(
% 0.73/1.10 ( ! [X2 : $rat,X0 : $rat,X1 : $rat] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 0.73/1.10 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 tff(f14,plain,(
% 0.73/1.10 ? [X0 : $rat] : (23/4 != X0 & $sum(17/4,X0) = 10/1)),
% 0.73/1.10 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 tff(f15,plain,(
% 0.73/1.10 ? [X0 : $rat] : (23/4 != X0 & $sum(17/4,X0) = 10/1) => (23/4 != sK0 & 10/1 = $sum(17/4,sK0))),
% 0.73/1.10 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 tff(f16,plain,(
% 0.73/1.10 23/4 != sK0 & 10/1 = $sum(17/4,sK0)),
% 0.73/1.10 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f14,f15])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 tff(f17,plain,(
% 0.73/1.10 10/1 = $sum(17/4,sK0)),
% 0.73/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 tff(f18,plain,(
% 0.73/1.10 23/4 != sK0),
% 0.73/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 cnf(c_58,plain,
% 0.73/1.10 ($sum_rat($sum_rat(X0_4,X1_4),X2_4) = $sum_rat(X0_4,$sum_rat(X1_4,X2_4))),
% 0.73/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 cnf(c_59,plain,
% 0.73/1.10 ($sum_rat(X0_4,X1_4) = $sum_rat(X1_4,X0_4)),
% 0.73/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
% 0.73/1.10 (sK0 != 23/4),
% 0.73/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
% 0.73/1.10 ($sum_rat(17/4,sK0) = 10/1),
% 0.73/1.10 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 cnf(c_71,negated_conjecture,
% 0.73/1.10 ($sum_rat(sK0,17/4) = 10/1),
% 0.73/1.10 inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_58,c_59])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 cnf(c_110,plain,
% 0.73/1.10 (sK0 = 23/4),
% 0.73/1.10 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_71])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 cnf(c_111,plain,
% 0.73/1.10 ($false),
% 0.73/1.10 inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_60])).
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.73/1.10
% 0.73/1.10
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------