TSTP Solution File: ARI187_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI187_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:06:26 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.77s 0.95s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.07 % Problem : ARI187_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.04/0.07 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.06/0.26 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.26 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.26 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.26 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.06/0.26 % DateTime : Fri May 3 00:54:10 EDT 2024
% 0.06/0.26 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.33 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.10/0.33 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.77/0.95 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/0.95 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 ------ iProver source info
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.77/0.95 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.77/0.95 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 ------ Parsing...
% 0.77/0.95 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.77/0.95 p($sum($product(14,3),8)) => p(50)),
% 0.77/0.95 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1)).
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.77/0.95 ~(p($sum($product(14,3),8)) => p(50))),
% 0.77/0.95 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 tff(f3,plain,(
% 0.77/0.95 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 0.77/0.95 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 tff(f4,plain,(
% 0.77/0.95 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 0.77/0.95 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 tff(f14,plain,(
% 0.77/0.95 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($product(X0,X1) = $product(X1,X0)) )),
% 0.77/0.95 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 tff(f15,plain,(
% 0.77/0.95 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($product(X0,$product(X1,X2)) = $product($product(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 0.77/0.95 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 tff(f21,plain,(
% 0.77/0.95 ~p(50) & p($sum($product(14,3),8))),
% 0.77/0.95 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2])).
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 tff(f22,plain,(
% 0.77/0.95 p($sum($product(14,3),8))),
% 0.77/0.95 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 tff(f23,plain,(
% 0.77/0.95 ~p(50)),
% 0.77/0.95 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 cnf(c_54,plain,
% 0.77/0.95 ($product_int($product_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $product_int(X0_3,$product_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 0.77/0.95 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15])).
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 cnf(c_55,plain,
% 0.77/0.95 ($product_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $product_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 0.77/0.95 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14])).
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 cnf(c_65,plain,
% 0.77/0.95 ($sum_int($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 0.77/0.95 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 0.77/0.95
% 0.77/0.95 cnf(c_66,plain,
% 0.77/0.95 ($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $sum_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 0.77/0.95 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3])).
% 0.77/0.96
% 0.77/0.96 cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,(~p(50)),inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23])).
% 0.77/0.96
% 0.77/0.96 cnf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
% 0.77/0.96 (p($sum_int($product_int(14,3),8))),
% 0.77/0.96 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22])).
% 0.77/0.96
% 0.77/0.96 cnf(c_89,negated_conjecture,
% 0.77/0.96 (p($sum_int(8,$product_int(14,3)))),
% 0.77/0.96 inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_54,c_55,c_65,c_66])).
% 0.77/0.96
% 0.77/0.96 cnf(c_200,plain,
% 0.77/0.96 (p(50)),
% 0.77/0.96 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_89])).
% 0.77/0.96
% 0.77/0.96 cnf(c_201,plain,
% 0.77/0.96 ($false),
% 0.77/0.96 inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_200,c_67])).
% 0.77/0.96
% 0.77/0.96
% 0.77/0.96 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/0.96
% 0.77/0.96
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------