TSTP Solution File: ARI175_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI175_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:06:24 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.47s 1.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : ARI175_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 3 00:30:51 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.19/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.47/1.16 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.16 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 ------ iProver source info
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.47/1.16 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.47/1.16 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 ------ Parsing...
% 0.47/1.16 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.47/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 0.47/1.16 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 clauses 22
% 0.47/1.16 conjectures 1
% 0.47/1.16 EPR 7
% 0.47/1.16 Horn 19
% 0.47/1.16 unary 17
% 0.47/1.16 binary 2
% 0.47/1.16 lits 30
% 0.47/1.16 lits eq 16
% 0.47/1.16 fd_pure 0
% 0.47/1.16 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.47/1.16 fd_cond 0
% 0.47/1.16 fd_pseudo_cond 2
% 0.47/1.16 AC symbols 2
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 ------
% 0.47/1.16 Current options:
% 0.47/1.16 ------
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.47/1.16 ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : $sum($product(3,X0),$product(5,X1)) = 23),
% 0.47/1.16 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1)).
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.47/1.16 ~? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : $sum($product(3,X0),$product(5,X1)) = 23),
% 0.47/1.16 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 tff(f16,plain,(
% 0.47/1.16 ( ! [X0 : $int] : ($product(X0,1) = X0) )),
% 0.47/1.16 introduced(theory_axiom_140,[])).
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 tff(f21,plain,(
% 0.47/1.16 ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : $sum($product(3,X0),$product(5,X1)) != 23),
% 0.47/1.16 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2])).
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 tff(f22,plain,(
% 0.47/1.16 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum($product(3,X0),$product(5,X1)) != 23) )),
% 0.47/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 cnf(c_53,plain,
% 0.47/1.16 ($product_int(X0_3,1) = X0_3),
% 0.47/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
% 0.47/1.16 ($sum_int($product_int(3,X0_3),$product_int(5,X1_3)) != 23),
% 0.47/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22])).
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 cnf(c_655,plain,
% 0.47/1.16 ($sum_int(3,$product_int(5,X0_3)) != 23),
% 0.47/1.16 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_67])).
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 cnf(c_692,plain,
% 0.47/1.16 (X0_3 != 4),
% 0.47/1.16 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_655])).
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 cnf(c_694,plain,
% 0.47/1.16 ($false),
% 0.47/1.16 inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_692])).
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.16
% 0.47/1.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------