TSTP Solution File: ARI174_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI174_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:06:24 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 2.83s 1.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : ARI174_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.14/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 01:05:03 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.83/1.16 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.83/1.16 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 ------ iProver source info
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.83/1.16 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.83/1.16 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 ------ Parsing...
% 2.83/1.16 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.83/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 2.83/1.16 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 clauses 22
% 2.83/1.16 conjectures 1
% 2.83/1.16 EPR 7
% 2.83/1.16 Horn 19
% 2.83/1.16 unary 17
% 2.83/1.16 binary 2
% 2.83/1.16 lits 30
% 2.83/1.16 lits eq 16
% 2.83/1.16 fd_pure 0
% 2.83/1.16 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.83/1.16 fd_cond 0
% 2.83/1.16 fd_pseudo_cond 2
% 2.83/1.16 AC symbols 2
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 ------
% 2.83/1.16 Current options:
% 2.83/1.16 ------
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 2.83/1.16 ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : $sum($product(3,X0),$product(5,X1)) = 24),
% 2.83/1.16 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1)).
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 2.83/1.16 ~? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : $sum($product(3,X0),$product(5,X1)) = 24),
% 2.83/1.16 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 tff(f3,plain,(
% 2.83/1.16 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 2.83/1.16 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 tff(f4,plain,(
% 2.83/1.16 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 2.83/1.16 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 2.83/1.16
% 2.83/1.16 tff(f14,plain,(
% 2.83/1.16 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($product(X0,X1) = $product(X1,X0)) )),
% 2.83/1.17 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 tff(f15,plain,(
% 2.83/1.17 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($product(X0,$product(X1,X2)) = $product($product(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 2.83/1.17 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 tff(f17,plain,(
% 2.83/1.17 ( ! [X0 : $int] : (0 = $product(X0,0)) )),
% 2.83/1.17 introduced(theory_axiom_152,[])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 tff(f21,plain,(
% 2.83/1.17 ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : $sum($product(3,X0),$product(5,X1)) != 24),
% 2.83/1.17 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 tff(f22,plain,(
% 2.83/1.17 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum($product(3,X0),$product(5,X1)) != 24) )),
% 2.83/1.17 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 cnf(c_52,plain,
% 2.83/1.17 ($product_int(X0_3,0) = 0),
% 2.83/1.17 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 cnf(c_54,plain,
% 2.83/1.17 ($product_int($product_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $product_int(X0_3,$product_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 2.83/1.17 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 cnf(c_55,plain,
% 2.83/1.17 ($product_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $product_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 2.83/1.17 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 cnf(c_65,plain,
% 2.83/1.17 ($sum_int($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 2.83/1.17 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 cnf(c_66,plain,
% 2.83/1.17 ($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $sum_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 2.83/1.17 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
% 2.83/1.17 ($sum_int($product_int(3,X0_3),$product_int(5,X1_3)) != 24),
% 2.83/1.17 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 cnf(c_650,plain,
% 2.83/1.17 ($sum_int($product_int(3,X0_3),0) != 24),
% 2.83/1.17 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_67])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 cnf(c_651,plain,
% 2.83/1.17 ($sum_int(0,$product_int(3,X0_3)) != 24),
% 2.83/1.17 inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_650,c_65,c_66,c_54,c_55])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 cnf(c_718,plain,
% 2.83/1.17 (X0_3 != 8),
% 2.83/1.17 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_651])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 cnf(c_720,plain,
% 2.83/1.17 ($false),
% 2.83/1.17 inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_718])).
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 2.83/1.17
% 2.83/1.17
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------