TSTP Solution File: ARI131_1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : ARI131_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:47:31 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 12 unt; 2 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 12 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 5 ( 5 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 1 ( 1 fml; 0 var)
% Number arithmetic : 32 ( 0 atm; 11 fun; 21 num; 0 var)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 2 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_5,type,
sF0: $int ).
tff(func_def_6,type,
sF1: $int ).
tff(f24,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f23]) ).
tff(f23,plain,
0 != 0,
inference(superposition,[],[f19,f22]) ).
tff(f22,plain,
0 = sF1,
inference(evaluation,[],[f21]) ).
tff(f21,plain,
$sum(-2,2) = sF1,
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f18,f20]) ).
tff(f20,plain,
2 = sF0,
inference(evaluation,[],[f17]) ).
tff(f17,plain,
$uminus(-2) = sF0,
introduced(function_definition,[]) ).
tff(f18,plain,
$sum(-2,sF0) = sF1,
introduced(function_definition,[]) ).
tff(f19,plain,
0 != sF1,
inference(definition_folding,[],[f16,f18,f17]) ).
tff(f16,plain,
$sum(-2,$uminus(-2)) != 0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
tff(f15,plain,
$sum(-2,$uminus(-2)) != 0,
inference(flattening,[],[f2]) ).
tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ $sum(-2,$uminus(-2)) )
= 0 ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
tff(f1,conjecture,
$sum(-2,$uminus(-2)) = 0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_n2_uminus_to_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : ARI131=1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 15:21:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.48 % (16904)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/498Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (16885)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (16885)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.49 % (16885)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 % (16885)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (16885)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.49 % (16885)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.49 % (16885)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 % (16885)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.19/0.49 % (16885)Time elapsed: 0.086 s
% 0.19/0.49 % (16885)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.19/0.49 % (16885)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (16885)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (16881)Success in time 0.145 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------