TSTP Solution File: ARI065_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : ARI065_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:06:11 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.83s 1.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : ARI065_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 3 01:17:24 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.83/1.14 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/1.14 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 ------ iProver source info
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.83/1.14 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.83/1.14 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 ------ Parsing...
% 0.83/1.14 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.83/1.14 ! [X0 : $int] : ($sum(2,X0) = 5 => 3 = X0)),
% 0.83/1.14 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum2_only_3_5)).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.83/1.14 ~! [X0 : $int] : ($sum(2,X0) = 5 => 3 = X0)),
% 0.83/1.14 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 tff(f3,plain,(
% 0.83/1.14 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 0.83/1.14 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 tff(f4,plain,(
% 0.83/1.14 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 0.83/1.14 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 tff(f15,plain,(
% 0.83/1.14 ? [X0 : $int] : (3 != X0 & $sum(2,X0) = 5)),
% 0.83/1.14 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 tff(f16,plain,(
% 0.83/1.14 ? [X0 : $int] : (3 != X0 & $sum(2,X0) = 5) => (3 != sK0 & 5 = $sum(2,sK0))),
% 0.83/1.14 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 tff(f17,plain,(
% 0.83/1.14 3 != sK0 & 5 = $sum(2,sK0)),
% 0.83/1.14 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f15,f16])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 tff(f18,plain,(
% 0.83/1.14 5 = $sum(2,sK0)),
% 0.83/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 tff(f19,plain,(
% 0.83/1.14 3 != sK0),
% 0.83/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 cnf(c_59,plain,
% 0.83/1.14 ($sum_int($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 0.83/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 cnf(c_60,plain,
% 0.83/1.14 ($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $sum_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 0.83/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
% 0.83/1.14 (sK0 != 3),
% 0.83/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
% 0.83/1.14 ($sum_int(2,sK0) = 5),
% 0.83/1.14 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 cnf(c_76,negated_conjecture,
% 0.83/1.14 ($sum_int(sK0,2) = 5),
% 0.83/1.14 inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_59,c_60])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 cnf(c_160,plain,
% 0.83/1.14 (sK0 = 3),
% 0.83/1.14 inference(smt_theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_76])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 cnf(c_161,plain,
% 0.83/1.14 ($false),
% 0.83/1.14 inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_160,c_61])).
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/1.14
% 0.83/1.14
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------