TSTP Solution File: ANA042-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : ANA042-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:38:38 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),c_times(X1,v_h(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),t_c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(X1,X2),t_c),c_times(v_x,v_h(X1,X2),t_c),t_c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),c_times(X1,v_h(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),t_c),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),c_times(X1,v_h(v_xa(X1),v_xb(X1)),t_c),t_c),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(X1,X2),t_c),c_times(v_x,v_h(X1,X2),t_c),t_c),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : ANA042-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 20 08:00:22 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.69 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.47/0.69 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.69 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.69 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.69 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.69 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.69 # new_bool_1 with pid 15313 completed with status 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.47/0.69 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.69 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.69 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.69 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.69 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.47/0.69 # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.69 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.47/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 163s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.69 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 15317 completed with status 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 0.47/0.69 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.69 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.69 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.69 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.69 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.47/0.69 # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.69 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.47/0.69 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 163s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.69 # Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 0.47/0.69 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.47/0.69
% 0.47/0.69 # Proof found!
% 0.47/0.69 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.47/0.69 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.69 # Parsed axioms : 2787
% 0.47/0.69 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1668
% 0.47/0.69 # Initial clauses : 1119
% 0.47/0.69 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1119
% 0.47/0.69 # Processed clauses : 2261
% 0.47/0.69 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.47/0.69 # ...subsumed : 467
% 0.47/0.69 # ...remaining for further processing : 1787
% 0.47/0.69 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.47/0.69 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.47/0.69 # Generated clauses : 1302
% 0.47/0.69 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1016
% 0.47/0.69 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.47/0.69 # Paramodulations : 1300
% 0.47/0.69 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # NegExts : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.47/0.69 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Total rewrite steps : 518
% 0.47/0.69 # ...of those cached : 312
% 0.47/0.69 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.69 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.69 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.69 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.69 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.69 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.69 # Current number of processed clauses : 717
% 0.47/0.69 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 171
% 0.47/0.69 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.47/0.69 # Negative unit clauses : 88
% 0.47/0.69 # Non-unit-clauses : 454
% 0.47/0.69 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 938
% 0.47/0.69 # ...number of literals in the above : 2539
% 0.47/0.69 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Current number of archived clauses : 1070
% 0.47/0.69 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 519605
% 0.47/0.69 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 254490
% 0.47/0.69 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 369
% 0.47/0.69 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 880
% 0.47/0.69 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # BW rewrite match attempts : 218
% 0.47/0.69 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.47/0.69 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.47/0.69 # Termbank termtop insertions : 70331
% 0.47/0.69 # Search garbage collected termcells : 6563
% 0.47/0.69
% 0.47/0.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.69 # User time : 0.145 s
% 0.47/0.69 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.47/0.69 # Total time : 0.153 s
% 0.47/0.69 # Maximum resident set size: 5136 pages
% 0.47/0.69
% 0.47/0.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.69 # User time : 0.197 s
% 0.47/0.69 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.47/0.69 # Total time : 0.208 s
% 0.47/0.69 # Maximum resident set size: 3500 pages
% 0.47/0.69 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------