TSTP Solution File: ANA024-2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : ANA024-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 04:31:56 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 18 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 8 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f17,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f16,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X4] : c_lessequals(v_k(X4),v_f(X4),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f16,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_k(v_x),v_f(v_x),t_b),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f14,f12]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
! [X0,X1] : c_plus(c_minus(X0,X1,t_b),X1,t_b) = X0,
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f10,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X0)
| c_plus(c_minus(X1,X2,X0),X2,X0) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Ocompare__rls__10_0) ).
fof(f10,plain,
class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(t_b),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f8,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X5] :
( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X5)
| class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add_0) ).
fof(f8,plain,
class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(t_b),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f7,f6]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X5] :
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X5)
| class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_54) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_tcs) ).
fof(f14,plain,
~ c_lessequals(c_plus(c_minus(v_k(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),v_g(v_x),t_b),v_f(v_x),t_b),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f8,f4,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_lessequals(c_plus(X1,X2,X0),X3,X0)
| ~ class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add(X0)
| c_lessequals(X1,c_minus(X3,X2,X0),X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Ocompare__rls__9_1) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
~ c_lessequals(c_minus(v_k(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),c_minus(v_f(v_x),v_g(v_x),t_b),t_b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ANA024-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:29:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 % (25265)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.37 % (25267)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.37 TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.37 TRYING [3]
% 0.14/0.37 % (25268)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.14/0.37 TRYING [4]
% 0.14/0.37 % (25266)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (25268)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (25271)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (25272)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (25269)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (25270)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.37 % (25272)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.37 % (25271)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.37 TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.37 % (25272)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-25265"
% 0.14/0.37 TRYING [5]
% 0.14/0.37 TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.38 % (25270)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.38 TRYING [3]
% 0.14/0.38 % (25268)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.38 % (25272)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.38 % (25272)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (25272)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.14/0.38 % (25272)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (25272)Memory used [KB]: 741
% 0.14/0.38 % (25272)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (25272)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (25265)Success in time 0.009 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------