TSTP Solution File: ANA019-2 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : ANA019-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 19:26:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.57s 1.74s
% Output   : Refutation 1.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (  15 unt;   3 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   44 (   9 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    v_f(c_0) = c_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_less(c_0,v_x,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(c_Suc(X)),t_a),c_times(v_x,c_HOL_Oabs(v_h(c_Suc(X)),t_a),t_a),t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_xa(X)),t_a),c_times(X,c_HOL_Oabs(v_h(v_xa(X)),t_a),t_a),t_a)
    | ~ c_less(c_0,X,t_a) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_tcs) ).

cnf(cls_NatBin_OSuc__pred_H_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_less(c_0,X,tc_nat)
    | X = c_Suc(c_minus(X,c_1,tc_nat)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_NatBin_OSuc__pred_H_0) ).

cnf(cls_Nat_Onot__gr0_0,axiom,
    ( c_less(c_0,X,tc_nat)
    | X = c_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Nat_Onot__gr0_0) ).

cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__eq__0_1,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X)
    | c_HOL_Oabs(c_0,X) = c_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__eq__0_1) ).

cnf(cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__ge__zero_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X)
    | c_lessequals(c_0,c_HOL_Oabs(Y,X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__ge__zero_0) ).

cnf(cls_Orderings_Oorder__less__imp__le_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X)
    | ~ c_less(Y,Z,X)
    | c_lessequals(Y,Z,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Orderings_Oorder__less__imp__le_0) ).

cnf(cls_Ring__and__Field_Omult__nonneg__nonneg_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__cancel__semiring(X)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_0,Y,X)
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_0,Z,X)
    | c_lessequals(c_0,c_times(Z,Y,X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Ring__and__Field_Omult__nonneg__nonneg_0) ).

cnf(clsrel_LOrder_Ojoin__semilorder_1,axiom,
    ( ~ class_LOrder_Ojoin__semilorder(X)
    | class_Orderings_Oorder(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_LOrder_Ojoin__semilorder_1) ).

cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_35,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X)
    | class_LOrder_Ojoin__semilorder(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_35) ).

cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_40,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X)
    | class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__cancel__semiring(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_40) ).

cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X)
    | class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50) ).

cnf(16,plain,
    class_LOrder_Ojoin__semilorder(t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_35,tfree_tcs]) ).

cnf(17,plain,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Opordered__cancel__semiring(t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_40,tfree_tcs]) ).

cnf(18,plain,
    class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom_50,tfree_tcs]) ).

cnf(19,plain,
    ( X = c_0
    | X = c_Suc(c_minus(X,c_1,tc_nat)) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_NatBin_OSuc__pred_H_0,cls_Nat_Onot__gr0_0]) ).

cnf(20,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_xa(v_x)),t_a),c_times(v_x,c_HOL_Oabs(v_h(v_xa(v_x)),t_a),t_a),t_a),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3,cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    class_Orderings_Oorder(t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clsrel_LOrder_Ojoin__semilorder_1,16]) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    c_HOL_Oabs(c_0,t_a) = c_0,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__eq__0_1,18]) ).

cnf(23,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_0,c_HOL_Oabs(X,t_a),t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_OrderedGroup_Oabs__ge__zero_0,18]) ).

cnf(24,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_0,v_x,t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Orderings_Oorder__less__imp__le_0,21,cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(27,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_0,c_times(v_x,c_HOL_Oabs(X,t_a),t_a),t_a),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Ring__and__Field_Omult__nonneg__nonneg_0,23,17,24]) ).

cnf(75,plain,
    ( X = c_0
    | c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(X),t_a),c_times(v_x,c_HOL_Oabs(v_h(X),t_a),t_a),t_a) ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2,19,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5212,plain,
    v_xa(v_x) = c_0,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[20,75]) ).

cnf(5213,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[20,27,22,cls_conjecture_0,5212,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : ANA019-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 02:55:57 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-08T02:55:57
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n003.cluster.edu at 2022-07-08T02:55:57
% 1.57/1.74  
% 1.57/1.74  
% 1.57/1.74  #||
% 1.57/1.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.57/1.74  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.57/1.75  ||#
% 1.57/1.75  
% 1.57/1.75  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.57/1.75  ;     10593 formulas have been input or derived (from 96 formulas).
% 1.57/1.75  ;      5213 (49%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.57/1.75  ;            2 ( 0%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.57/1.75  ;         5211 (100%) are still being kept.
% 1.57/1.75  ; 
% 1.57/1.75  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.003   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (15 calls)
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.492  39%   Process new row              (10,570 calls)
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.399  32%   Resolution                   (190 calls)
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.004   0%   Paramodulation               (95 calls)
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.001   0%   Condensing                   (13 calls)
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (13 calls)
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (13 calls)
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.108   9%   Forward simplification       (10,570 calls)
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.195  15%   Backward simplification      (5,213 calls)
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.001   0%   Ordering                     (278 calls)
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.57/1.75  ;     0.060   5%   Other
% 1.57/1.75  ;     1.263        Total
% 1.57/1.75  ;     1.267        Real time
% 1.57/1.75  ; 
% 1.57/1.75  ; Term-hash-array has 10,501 terms in all.
% 1.57/1.75  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 13 entries (13 at peak, 13 added, 0 deleted).
% 1.57/1.75  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 84 nodes (84 at peak, 84 added, 0 deleted).
% 1.57/1.75  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 13 calls.
% 1.57/1.75  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 13 calls.
% 1.57/1.75  ; Path-index has 10,499 entries (10,506 at peak, 10,506 added, 7 deleted).
% 1.57/1.75  ; Path-index has 429 nodes (442 at peak, 442 added, 13 deleted).
% 1.57/1.75  ; Trie-index has 10,499 entries (10,506 at peak, 10,506 added, 7 deleted).
% 1.57/1.75  ; Trie-index has 55,150 nodes (55,185 at peak, 55,185 added, 35 deleted).
% 1.57/1.75  ; Retrieved 5,357 generalization terms in 16,187 calls.
% 1.57/1.75  ; Retrieved 5,199 instance terms in 5,199 calls.
% 1.57/1.75  ; Retrieved 756,183 unifiable terms in 12,112 calls.
% 1.57/1.75  ; 
% 1.57/1.75  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 1 entry:
% 1.57/1.75  ;     1 with value 0
% 1.57/1.75  ; The agenda of rows to process has 1 entry:
% 1.57/1.75  ;     1 with value 23
% 1.57/1.75  ; The agenda of rows to give has 5116 entries:
% 1.57/1.75  ;     1 with value (4 9)         264 with value (4 28)         128 with value (4 33)
% 1.57/1.75  ;    72 with value (4 23)        521 with value (4 29)         904 with value (4 34)
% 1.57/1.75  ;    34 with value (4 24)        128 with value (4 30)         768 with value (4 35)
% 1.57/1.75  ;    64 with value (4 25)        512 with value (4 31)         192 with value (4 36)
% 1.57/1.75  ;   280 with value (4 26)       1072 with value (4 32)         144 with value (4 37)
% 1.57/1.75  ;    32 with value (4 27)
% 1.57/1.75  Evaluation took:
% 1.57/1.75    1.268 seconds of real time
% 1.57/1.75    1.199315 seconds of user run time
% 1.57/1.75    0.066422 seconds of system run time
% 1.57/1.75    [Run times include 0.127 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.57/1.75    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.57/1.75    0 page faults and
% 1.57/1.75    91,355,496 bytes consed.
% 1.57/1.75  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.57/1.75  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-08T02:55:59
% 1.57/1.75  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.57/1.75  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------