TSTP Solution File: ANA013-2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : ANA013-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:32:47 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.43s 1.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 7 unt; 9 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 12 ( 7 >; 5 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 (; 8 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_lessequals > class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom > class_Orderings_Oorder > c_times > c_HOL_Oabs > #nlpp > v_x > v_f > v_c > t_b
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(v_c,type,
v_c: $i ).
tff(class_Orderings_Oorder,type,
class_Orderings_Oorder: $i > $o ).
tff(c_HOL_Oabs,type,
c_HOL_Oabs: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(c_times,type,
c_times: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom,type,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom: $i > $o ).
tff(c_lessequals,type,
c_lessequals: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(v_x,type,
v_x: $i > $i ).
tff(v_f,type,
v_f: $i > $i ).
tff(t_b,type,
t_b: $i ).
tff(f_29,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_39,axiom,
! [T] :
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(T)
| class_Orderings_Oorder(T) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_34,axiom,
! [T_a,V_x] :
( ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(T_a)
| c_lessequals(V_x,V_x,T_a) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_28,axiom,
! [V_U] : ~ c_lessequals(c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_c,t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(V_U)),t_b),t_b),c_times(V_U,c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(V_U)),t_b),t_b),t_b),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).
tff(c_9,plain,
! [T_5] :
( class_Orderings_Oorder(T_5)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(T_5) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_39]) ).
tff(c_13,plain,
class_Orderings_Oorder(t_b),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_9]) ).
tff(c_6,plain,
! [V_x_3,T_a_2] :
( c_lessequals(V_x_3,V_x_3,T_a_2)
| ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(T_a_2) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).
tff(c_15,plain,
! [V_U_8] : ~ c_lessequals(c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(v_c,t_b),c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(V_U_8)),t_b),t_b),c_times(V_U_8,c_HOL_Oabs(v_f(v_x(V_U_8)),t_b),t_b),t_b),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).
tff(c_19,plain,
~ class_Orderings_Oorder(t_b),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_15]) ).
tff(c_23,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_13,c_19]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : ANA013-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 15:19:28 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 2.43/1.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.43/1.51
% 2.43/1.51 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.43/1.53
% 2.43/1.53 Inference rules
% 2.43/1.53 ----------------------
% 2.43/1.53 #Ref : 0
% 2.43/1.53 #Sup : 2
% 2.43/1.53 #Fact : 0
% 2.43/1.53 #Define : 0
% 2.43/1.53 #Split : 0
% 2.43/1.53 #Chain : 0
% 2.43/1.53 #Close : 0
% 2.43/1.53
% 2.43/1.53 Ordering : KBO
% 2.43/1.53
% 2.43/1.53 Simplification rules
% 2.43/1.53 ----------------------
% 2.43/1.53 #Subsume : 0
% 2.43/1.53 #Demod : 1
% 2.43/1.53 #Tautology : 0
% 2.43/1.53 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 2.43/1.53 #BackRed : 0
% 2.43/1.53
% 2.43/1.53 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.43/1.53 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.43/1.53
% 2.43/1.53 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.43/1.53 ----------------------
% 2.43/1.53 Preprocessing : 0.37
% 2.43/1.54 Parsing : 0.21
% 2.43/1.54 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.43/1.54 Main loop : 0.14
% 2.43/1.54 Inferencing : 0.07
% 2.43/1.54 Reduction : 0.03
% 2.43/1.54 Demodulation : 0.02
% 2.43/1.54 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.43/1.54 Subsumption : 0.02
% 2.43/1.54 Abstraction : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54 Total : 0.54
% 2.43/1.54 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------