TSTP Solution File: ANA010-2 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : ANA010-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:54:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : ANA010-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 8 03:50:44 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.18/0.36 #
% 0.18/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.36 # Number of axioms: 9 Number of unprocessed: 9
% 0.18/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.18/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.18/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.18/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.18/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.18/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.18/0.36 # 9 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.18/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures.
% 0.18/0.36 # There are 4 start rule candidates:
% 0.18/0.36 # Found 4 unit axioms.
% 0.18/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.18/0.36 # 4 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.18/0.36 # 5 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.18/0.36 # 4 unit axiom clauses
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.18/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4
% 0.18/0.36 # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.18/0.36 # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on
% 0.18/0.36 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.18/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.18/0.36 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.18/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.18/0.36 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.18/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.18/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_13, negated_conjecture, (c_lessequals(c_0,v_f(X1),t_b))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (c_lessequals(v_f(X1),c_times(v_c,v_g(X1),t_b),t_b))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (~c_lessequals(v_f(v_x(X1)),c_times(X1,c_HOL_Oabs(v_g(v_x(X1)),t_b),t_b),t_b))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1)|~class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X1))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)|~class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X1))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (c_HOL_Oabs(X1,X2)=X1|~c_lessequals(c_0,X1,X2)|~class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(X2))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (c_lessequals(X1,X2,X3)|~class_Orderings_Oorder(X3)|~c_lessequals(X1,X4,X3)|~c_lessequals(X4,X2,X3))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (c_times(c_HOL_Oabs(X1,X2),c_HOL_Oabs(X3,X2),X2)=c_HOL_Oabs(c_times(X1,X3,X2),X2)|~class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(X2))).
% 0.18/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.18/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.18/0.36 # Found 4 steps
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(t_b)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__abs(t_b)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (class_Orderings_Oorder(t_b)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_77, ...])).
% 0.18/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.18/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.18/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.18/0.36 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.18/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.18/0.36 # Child (8678) has found a proof.
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 # Proof search is over...
% 0.18/0.36 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------