TSTP Solution File: ANA004-4 by Otter---3.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Otter---3.3
% Problem : ANA004-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:46:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 2.54s 2.72s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ANA004-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 09:57:54 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 2.54/2.71 ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 2.54/2.71 The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 2.54/2.71 Wed Jul 27 09:57:55 2022
% 2.54/2.71 The command was "./otter". The process ID is 29571.
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.54/2.71 set(auto).
% 2.54/2.71 dependent: set(auto1).
% 2.54/2.71 dependent: set(process_input).
% 2.54/2.71 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 2.54/2.71 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 2.54/2.71 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 2.54/2.71 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 2.54/2.71 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 2.54/2.71 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 2.54/2.71 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 2.54/2.71 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 2.54/2.71 dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 2.54/2.71 clear(print_given).
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 list(usable).
% 2.54/2.71 0 [] -less_or_e_qual(add(absolute(X),absolute(Y)),Z)|less_or_e_qual(absolute(add(X,Y)),Z).
% 2.54/2.71 0 [] -less_or_e_qual(Z,minimum(X,Y))|less_or_e_qual(Z,X).
% 2.54/2.71 0 [] -less_or_e_qual(Z,minimum(X,Y))|less_or_e_qual(Z,Y).
% 2.54/2.71 0 [] less_or_e_qual(X,n0)|less_or_e_qual(Y,n0)| -less_or_e_qual(minimum(X,Y),n0).
% 2.54/2.71 0 [] -less_or_e_qual(X,half(Z))| -less_or_e_qual(Y,half(Z))|less_or_e_qual(add(X,Y),Z).
% 2.54/2.71 0 [] less_or_e_qual(X,n0)| -less_or_e_qual(half(X),n0).
% 2.54/2.71 0 [] less_or_e_qual(Epsilon,n0)| -less_or_e_qual(delta_1(Epsilon),n0).
% 2.54/2.71 0 [] less_or_e_qual(Epsilon,n0)| -less_or_e_qual(delta_2(Epsilon),n0).
% 2.54/2.71 0 [] less_or_e_qual(Epsilon,n0)| -less_or_e_qual(absolute(add(Z,negate(a_real_number))),delta_1(Epsilon))|less_or_e_qual(absolute(add(f(Z),negate(f(a_real_number)))),Epsilon).
% 2.54/2.71 0 [] less_or_e_qual(Epsilon,n0)| -less_or_e_qual(absolute(add(Z,negate(a_real_number))),delta_2(Epsilon))|less_or_e_qual(absolute(add(g(Z),negate(g(a_real_number)))),Epsilon).
% 2.54/2.71 0 [] -less_or_e_qual(epsilon_0,n0).
% 2.54/2.71 0 [] less_or_e_qual(Delta,n0)|less_or_e_qual(absolute(add(xs(Delta),negate(a_real_number))),Delta).
% 2.54/2.71 0 [] less_or_e_qual(Delta,n0)| -less_or_e_qual(absolute(add(add(f(xs(Delta)),negate(f(a_real_number))),add(g(xs(Delta)),negate(g(a_real_number))))),epsilon_0).
% 2.54/2.71 end_of_list.
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 2.54/2.71 be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 2.54/2.71 satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 2.54/2.71 dependent: set(factor).
% 2.54/2.71 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 ------------> process usable:
% 2.54/2.71 ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 1 [] -less_or_e_qual(add(absolute(A),absolute(B)),C)|less_or_e_qual(absolute(add(A,B)),C).
% 2.54/2.71 ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 2 [] -less_or_e_qual(A,minimum(B,C))|less_or_e_qual(A,B).
% 2.54/2.71 ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 3 [] -less_or_e_qual(A,minimum(B,C))|less_or_e_qual(A,C).
% 2.54/2.71 ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 4 [] less_or_e_qual(A,n0)|less_or_e_qual(B,n0)| -less_or_e_qual(minimum(A,B),n0).
% 2.54/2.71 ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 5 [] -less_or_e_qual(A,half(B))| -less_or_e_qual(C,half(B))|less_or_e_qual(add(A,C),B).
% 2.54/2.71 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 6 [] less_or_e_qual(A,n0)| -less_or_e_qual(half(A),n0).
% 2.54/2.71 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 7 [] less_or_e_qual(A,n0)| -less_or_e_qual(delta_1(A),n0).
% 2.54/2.71 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 8 [] less_or_e_qual(A,n0)| -less_or_e_qual(delta_2(A),n0).
% 2.54/2.71 ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 9 [] less_or_e_qual(A,n0)| -less_or_e_qual(absolute(add(B,negate(a_real_number))),delta_1(A))|less_or_e_qual(absolute(add(f(B),negate(f(a_real_number)))),A).
% 2.54/2.71 ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 10 [] less_or_e_qual(A,n0)| -less_or_e_qual(absolute(add(B,negate(a_real_number))),delta_2(A))|less_or_e_qual(absolute(add(g(B),negate(g(a_real_number)))),A).
% 2.54/2.71 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 11 [] -less_or_e_qual(epsilon_0,n0).
% 2.54/2.71 ** KEPT (pick-wt=21): 12 [] less_or_e_qual(A,n0)| -less_or_e_qual(absolute(add(add(f(xs(A)),negate(f(a_real_number))),add(g(xs(A)),negate(g(a_real_number))))),epsilon_0).
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 ------------> process sos:
% 2.54/2.71 ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 15 [] less_or_e_qual(A,n0)|less_or_e_qual(absolute(add(xs(A),negate(a_real_number))),A).
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 ======= end of input processing =======
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 Resetting weight limit to 16.
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 Resetting weight limit to 16.
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 sos_size=710
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 ============ end of search ============
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 -------------- statistics -------------
% 2.54/2.71 clauses given 1113
% 2.54/2.71 clauses generated 98119
% 2.54/2.71 clauses kept 1263
% 2.54/2.71 clauses forward subsumed 571
% 2.54/2.71 clauses back subsumed 136
% 2.54/2.71 Kbytes malloced 7812
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 2.54/2.71 user CPU time 0.76 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.54/2.71 system CPU time 0.01 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.54/2.71 wall-clock time 2 (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 2.54/2.71
% 2.54/2.71 Process 29571 finished Wed Jul 27 09:57:57 2022
% 2.54/2.71 Otter interrupted
% 2.54/2.71 PROOF NOT FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------