TSTP Solution File: ALG439-1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : ALG439-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 04:14:34 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.79s
% Output : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 2 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 26 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 22 ( 10 ~; 10 |; 0 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 2 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f934,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f925,f926,f931,f933]) ).
fof(f933,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f932,f922,f918]) ).
fof(f918,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> v_c = v_y ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f922,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> v_y = c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f932,plain,
( v_c != v_y
| spl0_2 ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f924,f734]) ).
fof(f734,axiom,
! [X7,X4] : c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(X7,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X4,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = X7,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dHmFenT5Zi/Vampire---4.8_18158',cls_mpoly__base__conv_I2_J_0) ).
fof(f924,plain,
( v_y != c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f922]) ).
fof(f931,plain,
( spl0_1
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f930,f922,f918]) ).
fof(f930,plain,
( v_c = v_y
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f923,f734]) ).
fof(f923,plain,
( v_y = c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f922]) ).
fof(f926,plain,
( spl0_2
| spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f736,f918,f922]) ).
fof(f736,axiom,
( v_c = v_y
| v_y = c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dHmFenT5Zi/Vampire---4.8_18158',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f925,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f735,f922,f918]) ).
fof(f735,axiom,
( v_y != c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| v_c != v_y ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dHmFenT5Zi/Vampire---4.8_18158',cls_conjecture_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13 % Problem : ALG439-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 19:54:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.15/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dHmFenT5Zi/Vampire---4.8_18158
% 0.61/0.79 % (18378)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.61/0.79 % (18377)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.61/0.79 % (18379)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.79 % (18376)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.61/0.79 % (18380)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.61/0.79 % (18381)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.61/0.79 % (18382)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.61/0.79 % (18374)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.79 % (18378)First to succeed.
% 0.61/0.79 % (18378)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-18319"
% 0.61/0.79 % (18382)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (18382)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.79 % (18382)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.79 % (18382)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.61/0.79
% 0.61/0.79 % (18382)Memory used [KB]: 1668
% 0.61/0.79 % (18382)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.61/0.79 % (18382)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.61/0.79 % (18378)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.61/0.79 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for Vampire---4
% 0.61/0.79 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.79 % (18378)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.79 % (18378)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.79 % (18378)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.61/0.79
% 0.61/0.79 % (18378)Memory used [KB]: 1687
% 0.61/0.79 % (18378)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.61/0.79 % (18378)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.61/0.79 % (18319)Success in time 0.417 s
% 0.61/0.79 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------