TSTP Solution File: ALG439-1 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : ALG439-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 17:40:12 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.69s 0.88s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (   6 unt;   1 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (  35 equ;  20 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_resolve__eq__raw_I2_J_0,axiom,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(V_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),V_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = V_c ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_c != v_y
    | c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != v_y ) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = v_y
    | v_c = v_y ) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = v_c,
    inference(subst,[],[cls_resolve__eq__raw_I2_J_0:[bind(V_c,$fot(v_c)),bind(V_x,$fot(v_x))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != v_c
    | c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != v_y
    | v_c = v_y ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_y) ),[0],$fot(v_c)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != v_y
    | v_c = v_y ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_c) )],[refute_0_0,refute_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    v_c = v_y,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_y) )],[cls_conjecture_1,refute_0_2]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != v_c
    | v_c != v_y
    | c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = v_y ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( ~ $equal(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_y) ),[0],$fot(v_c)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    ( v_c != v_y
    | c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = v_y ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_c) )],[refute_0_0,refute_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    v_c = v_c,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(v_c)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    ( v_c != v_c
    | v_c != v_y
    | v_y = v_c ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(v_c,v_c) ),[0],$fot(v_y)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( v_c != v_y
    | v_y = v_c ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(v_c,v_c) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_7]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    ( v_c != v_c
    | v_y != v_c
    | v_c = v_y ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( ~ $equal(v_c,v_y) ),[1],$fot(v_c)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    ( v_c != v_c
    | v_c != v_y
    | v_c = v_y ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(v_y,v_c) )],[refute_0_8,refute_0_9]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    ( v_c != v_c
    | v_c != v_y
    | c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = v_y ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(v_c,v_y) )],[refute_0_10,refute_0_5]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    ( v_c != v_c
    | v_c != v_y ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_x,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_y) )],[refute_0_11,cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    v_c != v_y,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(v_c,v_c) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_12]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(v_c,v_y) )],[refute_0_3,refute_0_13]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : ALG439-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun  8 02:05:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.69/0.88  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.69/0.88  
% 0.69/0.88  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.69/0.89  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------