TSTP Solution File: ALG437-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : ALG437-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:01:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.24s 0.55s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.19 % Problem : ALG437-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.21 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.41 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.41 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.41 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.41 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.41 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 23:47:48 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.49 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.17/0.49 The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.17/0.49 Tue Jun 7 23:47:48 2022
% 0.17/0.49 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 29276.
% 0.17/0.49
% 0.17/0.49 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.17/0.49 set(auto).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.17/0.49 clear(print_given).
% 0.17/0.49
% 0.17/0.49 list(usable).
% 0.17/0.49
% 0.17/0.49 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.17/0.49
% 0.17/0.49 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.17/0.49 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.17/0.49 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.17/0.49 clauses in usable.
% 0.17/0.49
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.17/0.49 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.17/0.49
% 0.17/0.49 ------------> process usable:
% 0.17/0.49 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)|B=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A)|c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(C,B,A),B,A)=C.
% 0.17/0.49 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [flip.3] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)| -class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__by__zero(A)|c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A),C,A)=B|C=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.49 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)| -class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__by__zero(A)|c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A),C,A)=B|C=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.49 Following clause subsumed by 79 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(A)|c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(A),B,A)=B.
% 0.17/0.49 Following clause subsumed by 87 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(A)| -class_Int_Onumber__ring(A)|c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,D,A),A)=c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,D,A),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A),A).
% 0.17/0.49 Following clause subsumed by 99 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(A)|c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A)=c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(C,B,A).
% 0.17/0.49 Following clause subsumed by 114 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(A)|c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(B,C,A),D,A)=c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(B,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(C,D,A),A).
% 0.17/0.49 Following clause subsumed by 114 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(A)|c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(B,C,A),D,A)=c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(B,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(C,D,A),A).
% 0.17/0.49 Following clause subsumed by 119 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)|c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(B,B,A)=c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(A)|B=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.49 Following clause subsumed by 119 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)| -class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__by__zero(A)|c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(B,B,A)=c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(A)|B=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.49 Following clause subsumed by 152 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(A)|c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A),D,A)=c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(C,D,A),A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 152 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(A)|c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A),D,A)=c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(C,D,A),A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 155 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__algebra(A)|c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(C,D,A),A)=c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,D,A),A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 156 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__algebra(A)|c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(B,C,A),D,A)=c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,D,A),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(C,D,A),A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 161 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)|c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(c_Polynomial_Osmult(B,C,A),D,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A))|B=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A)| -c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(C,D,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A)).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 164 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)|c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(B,C,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A))|D=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A)| -c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(B,c_Polynomial_Osmult(D,C,A),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A)).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 154 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(A)|c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(B,D,A),C,A)=c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(D,C,A),A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 172 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__algebra(A)|c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A),A)=c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(B,A),C,A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 174 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__algebra(A)|c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A),A)=c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(C,A),A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 195 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(A)|c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(B,c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(C,A),A)=c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(B,C,A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_HOL_Oeq(A)|c_fequal(A)=c_HOL_Oeq__class_Oeq(A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 223 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__algebra(A)|c_RealVector_OscaleR__class_OscaleR(B,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(C,D,A),A)=c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_RealVector_OscaleR__class_OscaleR(B,C,A),D,A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 225 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__algebra(A)|c_RealVector_OscaleR__class_OscaleR(C,c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,D,A),A)=c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,c_RealVector_OscaleR__class_OscaleR(C,D,A),A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 242 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(A)|c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(B,A),B,A)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 245 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__algebra(A)|c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(C,D,A),A)=c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,D,A),A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 246 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__algebra(A)|c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(B,C,A),D,A)=c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,D,A),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(C,D,A),A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 232 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_SEQ_Obanach(A)| -class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__field(A)|c_Transcendental_Oexp(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(B,C,A),A)=c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_Transcendental_Oexp(B,A),c_Transcendental_Oexp(C,A),A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 287 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(A)|c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(B,A),A)=B.
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 287 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(A)|c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(B,A),A)=B.
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 287 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(A)|c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(B,A),A)=B.
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 299 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(A)|c_HOL_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A),A)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 308 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__algebra(A)|c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A),A)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 309 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__algebra(A)|c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A),B,A)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 307 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(A)|c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A),B,A)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 295 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)| -class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__by__zero(A)|c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A),A)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 312 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ozero__neq__one(A)|c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A)!=c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 318 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ono__zero__divisors(A)|c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A)!=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A)|B=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A)|C=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 321 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add(A)|c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(B,B,A)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oring(A)|c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(E,C,A),c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(B,E,A),C,A),D,A),A)=c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A),D,A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 358 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector(A)|c_RealVector_OscaleR__class_OscaleR(B,c_RealVector_OscaleR__class_OscaleR(C,D,A),A)=c_RealVector_OscaleR__class_OscaleR(C,c_RealVector_OscaleR__class_OscaleR(B,D,A),A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 362 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(A)|c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(B,C,A)=c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(C,B,A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 374 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(A)| -class_Int_Onumber__ring(A)|c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,C,A),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(D,E,A),A)!=c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(B,E,A),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(D,C,A),A)|C=E|B=D.
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 378 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)| -class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__by__zero(A)|c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(B,C,A),C,A)=B|C=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.50 Following clause subsumed by 402 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)|c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(B,c_Polynomial_Opoly__gcd(C,D,A),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A))| -c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(B,D,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A))| -c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(B,C,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A)).
% 0.17/0.51 Following clause subsumed by 369 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)| -class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__by__zero(A)|c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A),B,A),B,A)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.51 Following clause subsumed by 295 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)| -class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__by__zero(A)|c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(B,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A),A)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.51 Following clause subsumed by 295 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)| -class_Ring__and__Field_Odivision__by__zero(A)|c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(B,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A),A)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A).
% 0.17/0.51 Following clause subsumed by 440 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(A)|c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(A),B,A)=B.
% 0.17/0.51 Following clause subsumed by 168 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_HOL_Ozero(A)| -class_HOL_Oeq(A)|hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_HOL_Oeq__class_Oeq(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A)),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A))),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A)))).
% 0.17/0.51 Following clause subsumed by 472 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Ring__and__Field_Ofield(A)| -c_Polynomial_Opdivmod__rel(B,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A)),C,D,A)|C=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(A)).
% 0.17/0.51 152 back subsumes 40.
% 0.17/0.51 153 back subsumes 39.
% 0.17/0.51 499 back subsumes 448.
% 0.17/0.51 502 back subsumes 490.
% 0.17/0.51 503 back subsumes 488.
% 0.17/0.51 506 back subsumes 505.
% 0.17/0.51 512 back subsumes 507.
% 0.17/0.51 512 back subsumes 504.
% 0.17/0.51
% 0.17/0.51 ------------> process sos:
% 0.17/0.51 Following clause subsumed by 593 during input processing: 0 [demod,591] {-} hAPP(A,hAPP(B,v_x))=hAPP(A,hAPP(B,v_x)).
% 0.17/0.51 Following clause subsumed by 593 during input processing: 0 [demod,576] {-} hAPP(B,hAPP(A,v_x))=hAPP(B,hAPP(A,v_x)).
% 0.17/0.51 Following clause subsumed by 621 during input processing: 0 [demod,624] {-} c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex).
% 0.17/0.51 Following clause subsumed by 621 during input processing: 0 [demod,624] {-} c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)=c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex).
% 0.17/0.51 Following clause subsumed by 621 during input processing: 0 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.17/0.51 Following clause subsumed by 621 during input processing: 0 [copy,593,flip.1] {-} hAPP(A,hAPP(B,C))=hAPP(A,hAPP(B,C)).
% 0.17/0.51 Following clause subsumed by 621 during input processing: 0 [copy,606,flip.1] {-} v_x=v_x.
% 0.17/0.51 Following clause subsumed by 621 during input processing: 0 [copy,621,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.17/0.51 621 back subsumes 606.
% 0.17/0.51 621 back subsumes 593.
% 0.17/0.51 621 back subsumes 571.
% 0.17/0.51 621 back subsumes 560.
% 0.17/0.51 621 back subsumes 555.
% 0.17/0.51 621 back subsumes 554.
% 0.17/0.51
% 0.17/0.51 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.24/0.55 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.24/0.55 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.24/0.55 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.24/0.55 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.24/0.55 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.24/0.55 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 The job finished Tue Jun 7 23:47:48 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------