TSTP Solution File: ALG434-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : ALG434-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:00:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.48s 0.65s
% Output : Refutation 0.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_dvd__trans_0,axiom,
( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X)
| c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(Y,Z,X)
| ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(U,Z,X)
| ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(Y,U,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_dvd__trans_0) ).
cnf(cls_pq_0,axiom,
c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,v_q,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_pq_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_q,c_Polynomial_Osmult(v_a,v_q,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(v_p,c_Polynomial_Osmult(v_a,v_q,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
cnf(clsarity_Polynomial__Opoly__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X))
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Polynomial__Opoly__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
cnf(399,plain,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clsarity_Polynomial__Opoly__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1]) ).
cnf(473,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_dvd__trans_0,cls_conjecture_0,cls_CHAINED_0,cls_pq_0]),399]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : ALG434-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 8 02:45:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.45 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.45 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.46 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.46 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.46 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.46 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 "."
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-08T02:45:20
% 0.18/0.46 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n022.cluster.edu at 2022-06-08T02:45:20
% 0.41/0.58 WARNING:
% 0.41/0.58 |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.41/0.58 WARNING:
% 0.41/0.58 |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__idem__mult| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.41/0.58 WARNING:
% 0.41/0.58 |class_Lattices_Oboolean__algebra| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 #||
% 0.48/0.65 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/0.65 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.48/0.65 ||#
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.48/0.65 ; 672 formulas have been input or derived (from 194 formulas).
% 0.48/0.65 ; 473 (70%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.48/0.65 ; 10 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.48/0.65 ; 463 (98%) are still being kept.
% 0.48/0.65 ;
% 0.48/0.65 ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.102 53% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.010 5% Assert (441 calls)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.027 14% Process new row (559 calls)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.008 4% Resolution (386 calls)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.001 1% Paramodulation (193 calls)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.007 4% Condensing (398 calls)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.009 5% Forward subsumption (398 calls)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.001 1% Backward subsumption (357 calls)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.002 1% Clause clause subsumption (352 calls)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.003 2% Forward simplification (553 calls)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.004 2% Backward simplification (473 calls)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.000 0% Ordering (144 calls)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.001 1% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.001 1% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.017 9% Other
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.193 Total
% 0.48/0.65 ; 0.194 Real time
% 0.48/0.65 ;
% 0.48/0.65 ; Term-hash-array has 945 terms in all.
% 0.48/0.65 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 354 entries (354 at peak, 357 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.48/0.65 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,159 nodes (1,159 at peak, 1,165 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.48/0.65 ; Retrieved 376 possibly forward subsuming rows in 398 calls.
% 0.48/0.65 ; Retrieved 283 possibly backward subsumed rows in 357 calls.
% 0.48/0.65 ; Path-index has 928 entries (928 at peak, 950 added, 22 deleted).
% 0.48/0.65 ; Path-index has 3,303 nodes (3,303 at peak, 3,331 added, 28 deleted).
% 0.48/0.65 ; Trie-index has 928 entries (928 at peak, 950 added, 22 deleted).
% 0.48/0.65 ; Trie-index has 4,190 nodes (4,190 at peak, 4,272 added, 82 deleted).
% 0.48/0.65 ; Retrieved 100 generalization terms in 301 calls.
% 0.48/0.65 ; Retrieved 133 instance terms in 116 calls.
% 0.48/0.65 ; Retrieved 7,103 unifiable terms in 837 calls.
% 0.48/0.65 ;
% 0.48/0.65 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 195 entries:
% 0.48/0.65 ; 17 with value 19 11 with value 27 4 with value 34
% 0.48/0.65 ; 15 with value 20 8 with value 28 4 with value 37
% 0.48/0.65 ; 28 with value 21 4 with value 29 1 with value 38
% 0.48/0.65 ; 20 with value 22 9 with value 30 1 with value 39
% 0.48/0.65 ; 5 with value 23 3 with value 31 1 with value 40
% 0.48/0.65 ; 25 with value 24 1 with value 32 3 with value 43
% 0.48/0.65 ; 14 with value 25 5 with value 33 1 with value 47
% 0.48/0.65 ; 15 with value 26
% 0.48/0.65 ; The agenda of rows to give has 74 entries:
% 0.48/0.65 ; 32 with value (4 6) 5 with value (4 12) 6 with value (4 16)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 3 with value (4 8) 3 with value (4 13) 1 with value (4 17)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 3 with value (4 10) 5 with value (4 14) 3 with value (4 18)
% 0.48/0.65 ; 8 with value (4 11) 5 with value (4 15)
% 0.48/0.65 Evaluation took:
% 0.48/0.65 0.195 seconds of real time
% 0.48/0.65 0.180523 seconds of user run time
% 0.48/0.65 0.013994 seconds of system run time
% 0.48/0.65 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.48/0.65 0 page faults and
% 0.48/0.65 11,793,024 bytes consed.
% 0.48/0.65 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.48/0.65 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-08T02:45:20
% 0.48/0.65 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.48/0.65 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------