TSTP Solution File: ALG431-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : ALG431-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:13:21 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 231.38s 29.75s
% Output : CNFRefutation 231.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 52 ( 17 unt; 0 nHn; 35 RR)
% Number of literals : 100 ( 27 equ; 53 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 2 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 70 ( 12 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oidom_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oidom_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
cnf(clsarity_Polynomial__Opoly__Ring__and__Field_Oidom,axiom,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Polynomial__Opoly__Ring__and__Field_Oidom) ).
cnf(cls_dvd__refl_0,axiom,
( c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(X2,X2,X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_dvd__refl_0) ).
cnf(tfree_tcs_01,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_tcs_01) ).
cnf(cls_smult__dvd__cancel_0,axiom,
( c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(X2,X3,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(c_Polynomial_Osmult(X4,X2,X1),X3,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_smult__dvd__cancel_0) ).
cnf(cls_synthetic__div__correct_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_Polynomial_Osmult(X3,c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1),X1),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X2,X3,X1),c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1),X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_synthetic__div__correct_0) ).
cnf(cls_synthetic__div__eq__0__iff_1,axiom,
( c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Odegree(X2,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_synthetic__div__eq__0__iff_1) ).
cnf(cls_r_0,axiom,
( c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,t_a) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(t_a)
| ~ class_Int_Oring__char__0(t_a) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_r_0) ).
cnf(cls_dvd__0__left_0,axiom,
( X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_dvd__0__left_0) ).
cnf(cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I6_J_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X1) = X2
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I6_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
( v_thesis____
| v_p != c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),t_a) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(tfree_tcs,negated_conjecture,
class_Int_Oring__char__0(t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_tcs) ).
cnf(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oidom_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oidom_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oidom_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clsarity_Polynomial__Opoly__Ring__and__Field_Oidom]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(X2,X2,X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_dvd__refl_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(t_a),
tfree_tcs_01 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(X2,X3,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(c_Polynomial_Osmult(X4,X2,X1),X3,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_smult__dvd__cancel_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(X2,X2,X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
c_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_Polynomial_Osmult(X3,c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1),X1),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X2,X3,X1),c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1),X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_synthetic__div__correct_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Odegree(X2,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_synthetic__div__eq__0__iff_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,t_a) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(t_a)
| ~ class_Int_Oring__char__0(t_a) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_r_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_dvd__0__left_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(X2,X3,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(c_Polynomial_Osmult(X4,X2,X1),X3,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(X1,X1,tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(t_a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X1) = X2
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_class__semiring_Osemiring__rules_I6_J_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( v_thesis____
| v_p != c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),t_a) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_Polynomial_Osmult(X3,c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1),X1),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X2,X3,X1),c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1),X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
c_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X2,X3,X1) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Odegree(X2,X1) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) ),
c_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,t_a) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(t_a)
| ~ class_Int_Oring__char__0(t_a) ),
c_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
class_Int_Oring__char__0(t_a),
tfree_tcs ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( X2 = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2,X1) ),
c_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(X1,c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,X1,t_a),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X1) = X2
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
c_0_31 ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
( v_thesis____
| v_p != c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),t_a) ),
c_0_32 ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
c_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( c_Polynomial_OpCons(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1,X2,X3),c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X3)),X3) = c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X3)),X3),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X3))
| c_Polynomial_Odegree(X1,X3) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,t_a) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_20]),c_0_37])]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),t_a) = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
v_p != c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),t_a),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oidom_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(t_a),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45]),c_0_46]),c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom(X1) ),
c_0_48 ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : ALG431-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat May 18 23:51:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 231.38/29.75 # Version: 3.1.0
% 231.38/29.75 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 231.38/29.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 231.38/29.75 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 231.38/29.75 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 231.38/29.75 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 231.38/29.75 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 231.38/29.75 # G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 24198 completed with status 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 231.38/29.75 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 231.38/29.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 231.38/29.75 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 231.38/29.75 # No SInE strategy applied
% 231.38/29.75 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 231.38/29.75 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 231.38/29.75 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 487s (1) cores
% 231.38/29.75 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 231.38/29.75 # Starting new_bool_3 with 82s (1) cores
% 231.38/29.75 # G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 24207 completed with status 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 231.38/29.75 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 231.38/29.75 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 231.38/29.75 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 231.38/29.75 # No SInE strategy applied
% 231.38/29.75 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 231.38/29.75 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 231.38/29.75 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 487s (1) cores
% 231.38/29.75 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 231.38/29.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 231.38/29.75 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 231.38/29.75
% 231.38/29.75 # Proof found!
% 231.38/29.75 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 231.38/29.75 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 231.38/29.75 # Parsed axioms : 861
% 231.38/29.75 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Initial clauses : 861
% 231.38/29.75 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Initial clauses in saturation : 861
% 231.38/29.75 # Processed clauses : 63896
% 231.38/29.75 # ...of these trivial : 748
% 231.38/29.75 # ...subsumed : 52943
% 231.38/29.75 # ...remaining for further processing : 10205
% 231.38/29.75 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4448
% 231.38/29.75 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Backward-subsumed : 639
% 231.38/29.75 # Backward-rewritten : 366
% 231.38/29.75 # Generated clauses : 786119
% 231.38/29.75 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 729629
% 231.38/29.75 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 211
% 231.38/29.75 # Paramodulations : 781610
% 231.38/29.75 # Factorizations : 10
% 231.38/29.75 # NegExts : 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Equation resolutions : 4498
% 231.38/29.75 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Total rewrite steps : 684531
% 231.38/29.75 # ...of those cached : 637899
% 231.38/29.75 # Propositional unsat checks : 2
% 231.38/29.75 # Propositional check models : 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 231.38/29.75 # Propositional encoding time : 1.392
% 231.38/29.75 # Propositional solver time : 0.618
% 231.38/29.75 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 231.38/29.75 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 231.38/29.75 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 231.38/29.75 # Current number of processed clauses : 8420
% 231.38/29.75 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1296
% 231.38/29.75 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 302
% 231.38/29.75 # Negative unit clauses : 207
% 231.38/29.75 # Non-unit-clauses : 6615
% 231.38/29.75 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 666413
% 231.38/29.75 # ...number of literals in the above : 2640185
% 231.38/29.75 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Current number of archived clauses : 1781
% 231.38/29.75 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12640867
% 231.38/29.75 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4053737
% 231.38/29.75 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 38635
% 231.38/29.75 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 184716
% 231.38/29.75 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 20
% 231.38/29.75 # BW rewrite match attempts : 231858
% 231.38/29.75 # BW rewrite match successes : 1848
% 231.38/29.75 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Condensation successes : 0
% 231.38/29.75 # Termbank termtop insertions : 96257549
% 231.38/29.75 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1559
% 231.38/29.75
% 231.38/29.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 231.38/29.75 # User time : 28.150 s
% 231.38/29.75 # System time : 0.620 s
% 231.38/29.75 # Total time : 28.770 s
% 231.38/29.75 # Maximum resident set size: 3436 pages
% 231.38/29.75
% 231.38/29.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 231.38/29.75 # User time : 84.928 s
% 231.38/29.75 # System time : 1.398 s
% 231.38/29.75 # Total time : 86.326 s
% 231.38/29.75 # Maximum resident set size: 2300 pages
% 231.38/29.75 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------