TSTP Solution File: ALG428-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : ALG428-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:00:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.13s 2.35s
% Output : Refutation 2.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 5 unt; 1 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 11 ( 5 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Suc__pred_0,axiom,
( c_Suc(c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(X,c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),tc_nat)) = X
| ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X,tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Suc__pred_0) ).
cnf(cls_gr0I_0,axiom,
( c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),X,tc_nat)
| X = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_gr0I_0) ).
cnf(cls_dp_0,axiom,
c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_dp_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
( c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Suc(X)
| v_thesis____ ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(632,plain,
c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Suc(X),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(869,plain,
c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat),c_Polynomial_Odegree(v_p,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_nat),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_gr0I_0,cls_dp_0]) ).
cnf(2161,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Suc__pred_0,632]),869]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : ALG428-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 8 05:58:06 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.48 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.48 *
% 0.19/0.48 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.48 *
% 0.19/0.48 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.48 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.48 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.48 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.48 *
% 0.19/0.48 "."
% 0.19/0.48 *
% 0.19/0.48 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-08T05:58:06
% 0.19/0.48 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n020.cluster.edu at 2022-06-08T05:58:06
% 0.46/0.67
% 0.46/0.67 ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 0.46/0.67 WARNING:
% 0.46/0.67 |class_Lattices_Oboolean__algebra| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.46/0.67 WARNING:
% 0.46/0.67 |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.46/0.67 WARNING:
% 0.46/0.67 |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__idem__mult| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 2.13/2.35 ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 2.13/2.35
% 2.13/2.35 #||
% 2.13/2.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.13/2.35 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.13/2.35 ||#
% 2.13/2.35
% 2.13/2.35 ; Summary of computation:
% 2.13/2.35 ; 7626 formulas have been input or derived (from 446 formulas).
% 2.13/2.35 ; 2161 (28%) were retained. Of these,
% 2.13/2.35 ; 90 ( 4%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 2.13/2.35 ; 2071 (96%) are still being kept.
% 2.13/2.35 ;
% 2.13/2.35 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.164 9% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.015 1% Assert (891 calls)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.159 9% Process new row (6,686 calls)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.143 8% Resolution (890 calls)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.021 1% Paramodulation (445 calls)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (14 calls)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.037 2% Condensing (2,878 calls)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.107 6% Forward subsumption (2,878 calls)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.049 3% Backward subsumption (1,411 calls)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.035 2% Clause clause subsumption (7,867 calls)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.163 9% Forward simplification (6,666 calls)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.016 1% Backward simplification (2,148 calls)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.918 49% Ordering (18,952 calls)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.002 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 0.040 2% Other
% 2.13/2.35 ; 1.869 Total
% 2.13/2.35 ; 1.870 Real time
% 2.13/2.35 ;
% 2.13/2.35 ; Term-hash-array has 3,311 terms in all.
% 2.13/2.35 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,371 entries (1,371 at peak, 1,411 added, 40 deleted).
% 2.13/2.35 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 4,421 nodes (4,421 at peak, 4,657 added, 236 deleted).
% 2.13/2.35 ; Retrieved 12,286 possibly forward subsuming rows in 2,878 calls.
% 2.13/2.35 ; Retrieved 1,561 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,411 calls.
% 2.13/2.35 ; Path-index has 3,194 entries (3,194 at peak, 3,341 added, 147 deleted).
% 2.13/2.35 ; Path-index has 9,516 nodes (9,516 at peak, 9,708 added, 192 deleted).
% 2.13/2.35 ; Trie-index has 3,194 entries (3,194 at peak, 3,341 added, 147 deleted).
% 2.13/2.35 ; Trie-index has 12,985 nodes (12,985 at peak, 13,757 added, 772 deleted).
% 2.13/2.35 ; Retrieved 27,627 generalization terms in 26,695 calls.
% 2.13/2.35 ; Retrieved 2,151 instance terms in 846 calls.
% 2.13/2.35 ; Retrieved 193,206 unifiable terms in 3,927 calls.
% 2.13/2.35 ;
% 2.13/2.35 ; The agenda of rows to process has 13 entries:
% 2.13/2.35 ; 1 with value 17 1 with value 24 1 with value 30
% 2.13/2.35 ; 2 with value 19 4 with value 26 1 with value 33
% 2.13/2.35 ; 1 with value 21 2 with value 28
% 2.13/2.35 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 257 entries:
% 2.13/2.35 ; 35 with value 21 3 with value 29 1 with value 37
% 2.13/2.35 ; 23 with value 22 4 with value 30 1 with value 38
% 2.13/2.35 ; 9 with value 23 1 with value 31 14 with value 39
% 2.13/2.35 ; 36 with value 24 4 with value 32 1 with value 42
% 2.13/2.35 ; 24 with value 25 1 with value 34 5 with value 43
% 2.13/2.35 ; 8 with value 26 1 with value 35 8 with value 44
% 2.13/2.35 ; 71 with value 27 1 with value 36 1 with value 47
% 2.13/2.35 ; 5 with value 28
% 2.13/2.35 ; The agenda of rows to give has 1368 entries:
% 2.13/2.35 ; 3 with value (4 4) 61 with value (4 22) 3 with value (4 38)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 37 with value (4 6) 57 with value (4 23) 4 with value (4 39)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 2 with value (4 8) 74 with value (4 24) 3 with value (4 40)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 4 with value (4 9) 64 with value (4 25) 2 with value (4 41)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 13 with value (4 10) 97 with value (4 26) 3 with value (4 42)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 22 with value (4 11) 51 with value (4 27) 1 with value (4 44)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 26 with value (4 12) 31 with value (4 28) 3 with value (4 45)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 58 with value (4 13) 35 with value (4 29) 3 with value (4 46)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 68 with value (4 14) 24 with value (4 30) 1 with value (4 47)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 56 with value (4 15) 20 with value (4 31) 1 with value (4 49)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 85 with value (4 16) 25 with value (4 32) 1 with value (4 51)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 98 with value (4 17) 14 with value (4 33) 2 with value (4 62)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 78 with value (4 18) 14 with value (4 34) 4 with value (4 80)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 74 with value (4 19) 13 with value (4 35) 1 with value (4 84)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 69 with value (4 20) 5 with value (4 36) 2 with value (4 175)
% 2.13/2.35 ; 44 with value (4 21) 10 with value (4 37) 2 with value (4 254)
% 2.13/2.35 Evaluation took:
% 2.13/2.35 1.871 seconds of real time
% 2.13/2.35 1.778121 seconds of user run time
% 2.13/2.35 0.093159 seconds of system run time
% 2.13/2.35 [Run times include 0.081 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.13/2.35 0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.13/2.35 0 page faults and
% 2.13/2.35 121,574,272 bytes consed.
% 2.13/2.35 :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.13/2.35 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-08T05:58:08
% 2.13/2.35 :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.13/2.35 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------