TSTP Solution File: ALG402-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : ALG402-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 18:00:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 19.92s 20.10s
% Output   : Refutation 19.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (  13 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   27 (  10 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_dvd__0__left_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X)
    | Y = c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X)
    | ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(X),Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_dvd__0__left_0) ).

cnf(cls_dvd__mult__left_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X)
    | c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(Y,Z,X)
    | ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(Y,U,X),Z,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_dvd__mult__left_0) ).

cnf(cls_mult__1__left_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X)
    | c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X),Y,X) = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mult__1__left_0) ).

cnf(cls_one__dvd_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(X)
    | c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X),Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_one__dvd_0) ).

cnf(cls_power__one_0,axiom,
    ( ~ class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(X)
    | c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X),Y,X) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_power__one_0) ).

cnf(cls_One__nat__def_0,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat) = c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_One__nat__def_0) ).

cnf(cls_kas_I1_J_0,axiom,
    v_a____ != c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_kas_I1_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(Y,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(Y,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_Suc(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_nat)),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(583,plain,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(Y,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(Y,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0,cls_One__nat__def_0,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
    class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).

cnf(clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult,axiom,
    class_OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult) ).

cnf(711,plain,
    c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_one__dvd_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1]) ).

cnf(786,plain,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = X,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_mult__1__left_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult]) ).

cnf(876,plain,
    c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_power__one_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__OrderedGroup_Omonoid__mult]) ).

cnf(964,plain,
    ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_a____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_dvd__0__left_0,clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1,cls_kas_I1_J_0]) ).

cnf(2526,plain,
    ( c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(X,Y,tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
    | ~ c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(Z,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(Z,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),Y,tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[cls_dvd__mult__left_0,583,theory(equality)]),clsarity_Complex__Ocomplex__Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1]) ).

cnf(9328,plain,
    c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(X,c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X,c_HOL_Ominus__class_Ominus(v_k____,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_nat),tc_nat),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex) = c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[583,786,theory(equality)]),876,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(9334,plain,
    c_Ring__and__Field_Odvd__class_Odvd(X,Y,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[2526,711,9328,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(9335,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[964,9334]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : ALG402-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun  8 13:11:01 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-08T13:11:01
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n028.cluster.edu at 2022-06-08T13:11:01
% 0.50/0.70  
% 0.50/0.70  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 0.50/0.72  WARNING:
% 0.50/0.72     |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__semigroup__idem__mult| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.50/0.72  WARNING:
% 0.50/0.72     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 19.92/20.10  ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 19.92/20.10  
% 19.92/20.10  #||
% 19.92/20.10  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 19.92/20.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 19.92/20.10  ||#
% 19.92/20.10  
% 19.92/20.10  ; Summary of computation:
% 19.92/20.10  ;    119754 formulas have been input or derived (from 747 formulas).
% 19.92/20.10  ;      9335 ( 8%) were retained.  Of these,
% 19.92/20.10  ;          514 ( 6%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 19.92/20.10  ;         8821 (94%) are still being kept.
% 19.92/20.10  ; 
% 19.92/20.10  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 19.92/20.10  ;     0.206   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     0.033   0%   Assert                       (1,046 calls)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     1.174   6%   Process new row              (109,256 calls)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     4.814  25%   Resolution                   (1,492 calls)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     0.057   0%   Paramodulation               (746 calls)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (9 calls)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     0.575   3%   Condensing                   (46,606 calls)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     4.395  22%   Forward subsumption          (46,606 calls)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     0.313   2%   Backward subsumption         (3,948 calls)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     0.913   5%   Clause clause subsumption    (153,318 calls)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     5.032  26%   Forward simplification       (109,034 calls)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     0.145   1%   Backward simplification      (9,323 calls)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     1.579   8%   Ordering                     (284,037 calls)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     0.003   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 19.92/20.10  ;     0.393   2%   Other
% 19.92/20.10  ;    19.632        Total
% 19.92/20.10  ;    19.635        Real time
% 19.92/20.10  ; 
% 19.94/20.10  ; Term-hash-array has 18,366 terms in all.
% 19.94/20.10  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3,652 entries (3,738 at peak, 3,948 added, 296 deleted).
% 19.94/20.10  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 15,014 nodes (15,921 at peak, 16,885 added, 1,871 deleted).
% 19.94/20.10  ;  Retrieved 746,792 possibly forward subsuming rows in 46,606 calls.
% 19.94/20.10  ;  Retrieved 15,825 possibly backward subsumed rows in 3,948 calls.
% 19.94/20.10  ; Path-index has 17,741 entries (18,011 at peak, 18,490 added, 749 deleted).
% 19.94/20.10  ; Path-index has 15,290 nodes (15,494 at peak, 15,722 added, 432 deleted).
% 19.94/20.10  ; Trie-index has 17,741 entries (18,011 at peak, 18,490 added, 749 deleted).
% 19.94/20.10  ; Trie-index has 126,526 nodes (127,617 at peak, 129,851 added, 3,325 deleted).
% 19.94/20.10  ; Retrieved 759,209 generalization terms in 1,066,926 calls.
% 19.94/20.10  ; Retrieved 7,959 instance terms in 5,655 calls.
% 19.94/20.10  ; Retrieved 7,358,107 unifiable terms in 51,313 calls.
% 19.94/20.10  ; 
% 19.94/20.10  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 66 entries:
% 19.94/20.10  ;    66 with value 0
% 19.94/20.10  ; The agenda of rows to process has 42 entries:
% 19.94/20.10  ;     1 with value 28              2 with value 33               4 with value 38
% 19.94/20.10  ;    18 with value 29              1 with value 35               8 with value 40
% 19.94/20.10  ;     2 with value 32              2 with value 36               4 with value 41
% 19.94/20.10  ; The agenda of rows to give has 8083 entries:
% 19.94/20.10  ;     1 with value (4 6)         185 with value (4 27)          78 with value (4 44)
% 19.94/20.10  ;    34 with value (4 11)        249 with value (4 28)          28 with value (4 45)
% 19.94/20.10  ;    90 with value (4 12)        249 with value (4 29)          49 with value (4 46)
% 19.94/20.10  ;   105 with value (4 13)        237 with value (4 30)          50 with value (4 47)
% 19.94/20.10  ;   179 with value (4 14)        194 with value (4 31)          31 with value (4 48)
% 19.94/20.10  ;   239 with value (4 15)        192 with value (4 32)          38 with value (4 49)
% 19.94/20.10  ;   284 with value (4 16)        224 with value (4 33)          29 with value (4 50)
% 19.94/20.10  ;   300 with value (4 17)        182 with value (4 34)          10 with value (4 51)
% 19.94/20.10  ;   358 with value (4 18)        248 with value (4 35)          53 with value (4 52)
% 19.94/20.10  ;   317 with value (4 19)        130 with value (4 36)          31 with value (4 53)
% 19.94/20.10  ;   231 with value (4 20)        382 with value (4 37)           2 with value (4 54)
% 19.94/20.10  ;   268 with value (4 21)        169 with value (4 38)           5 with value (4 55)
% 19.94/20.10  ;   276 with value (4 22)        386 with value (4 39)           8 with value (4 56)
% 19.94/20.10  ;   262 with value (4 23)        176 with value (4 40)           4 with value (4 57)
% 19.94/20.10  ;   259 with value (4 24)        293 with value (4 41)           8 with value (4 58)
% 19.94/20.10  ;   310 with value (4 25)        171 with value (4 42)          11 with value (4 59)
% 19.94/20.10  ;   280 with value (4 26)        178 with value (4 43)          10 with value (4 61)
% 19.94/20.10  Evaluation took:
% 19.94/20.10    19.637 seconds of real time
% 19.94/20.10    18.388435 seconds of user run time
% 19.94/20.10    1.248008 seconds of system run time
% 19.94/20.10    [Run times include 2.217 seconds GC run time.]
% 19.94/20.10    0 calls to %EVAL
% 19.94/20.10    0 page faults and
% 19.94/20.10    1,558,359,544 bytes consed.
% 19.94/20.10  :PROOF-FOUND
% 19.94/20.10  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-08T13:11:21
% 19.94/20.10  :PROOF-FOUND
% 19.94/20.10  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------