TSTP Solution File: ALG391-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : ALG391-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BXHmXbi0eh true
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 17:13:02 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.63s 0.90s
% Output : Refutation 1.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14 % Problem : ALG391-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.15 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BXHmXbi0eh true
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 03:04:54 EDT 2023
% 0.22/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.22/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.37 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.22/0.37 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.23/0.37 % Running in FO mode
% 0.23/0.68 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.23/0.68 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.23/0.68 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.23/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.23/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.23/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.23/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.23/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.23/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.23/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.63/0.90 % Solved by fo/fo4.sh.
% 1.63/0.90 % done 32 iterations in 0.090s
% 1.63/0.90 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.63/0.90 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.63/0.90 thf(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero_type, type, c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero: $i > $i).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(c_Polynomial_Odegree_type, type, c_Polynomial_Odegree: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(v_cs_____type, type, v_cs____: $i).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(c_Polynomial_Opoly_type, type, c_Polynomial_Opoly: $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(v_x_type, type, v_x: $i).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(tc_Polynomial_Opoly_type, type, tc_Polynomial_Opoly: $i > $i).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(hAPP_type, type, hAPP: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(t_a_type, type, t_a: $i).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(cls_conjecture_2, conjecture,
% 1.63/0.90 (~( ( ( V_xa ) =
% 1.63/0.90 ( c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ ( tc_Polynomial_Opoly @ t_a ) ) ) |
% 1.63/0.90 ( ( c_Polynomial_Odegree @ V_xa @ t_a ) !=
% 1.63/0.90 ( c_Polynomial_Odegree @ v_cs____ @ t_a ) ) |
% 1.63/0.90 ( ( c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_cs____ @ ( hAPP @ v_x @ V_xa ) @ t_a ) !=
% 1.63/0.90 ( c_Polynomial_Opoly @ V_xa @ ( hAPP @ v_x @ V_xa ) @ t_a ) ) ))).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 1.63/0.90 (( ( V_xa ) = ( c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ ( tc_Polynomial_Opoly @ t_a ) ) ) |
% 1.63/0.90 ( ( c_Polynomial_Odegree @ V_xa @ t_a ) !=
% 1.63/0.90 ( c_Polynomial_Odegree @ v_cs____ @ t_a ) ) |
% 1.63/0.90 ( ( c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_cs____ @ ( hAPP @ v_x @ V_xa ) @ t_a ) !=
% 1.63/0.90 ( c_Polynomial_Opoly @ V_xa @ ( hAPP @ v_x @ V_xa ) @ t_a ) )),
% 1.63/0.90 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_2])).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl42, plain,
% 1.63/0.90 (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.63/0.90 (((X0) = (c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ (tc_Polynomial_Opoly @ t_a)))
% 1.63/0.90 | ((c_Polynomial_Odegree @ X0 @ t_a)
% 1.63/0.90 != (c_Polynomial_Odegree @ v_cs____ @ t_a))
% 1.63/0.90 | ((c_Polynomial_Opoly @ v_cs____ @ (hAPP @ v_x @ X0) @ t_a)
% 1.63/0.90 != (c_Polynomial_Opoly @ X0 @ (hAPP @ v_x @ X0) @ t_a)))),
% 1.63/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl95, plain,
% 1.63/0.90 ((((c_Polynomial_Odegree @ v_cs____ @ t_a)
% 1.63/0.90 != (c_Polynomial_Odegree @ v_cs____ @ t_a))
% 1.63/0.90 | ((v_cs____)
% 1.63/0.90 = (c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ (tc_Polynomial_Opoly @ t_a))))),
% 1.63/0.90 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl42])).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl96, plain,
% 1.63/0.90 (((v_cs____) = (c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ (tc_Polynomial_Opoly @ t_a)))),
% 1.63/0.90 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl95])).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(cls_conjecture_0, conjecture,
% 1.63/0.90 (( v_cs____ ) =
% 1.63/0.90 ( c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ ( tc_Polynomial_Opoly @ t_a ) ))).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
% 1.63/0.90 (( v_cs____ ) !=
% 1.63/0.90 ( c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ ( tc_Polynomial_Opoly @ t_a ) )),
% 1.63/0.90 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_0])).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl44, plain,
% 1.63/0.90 (((v_cs____) != (c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero @ (tc_Polynomial_Opoly @ t_a)))),
% 1.63/0.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 1.63/0.90 thf(zip_derived_cl97, plain, ($false),
% 1.63/0.90 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 1.63/0.90 [zip_derived_cl96, zip_derived_cl44])).
% 1.63/0.90
% 1.63/0.90 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.63/0.90
% 1.63/0.90
% 1.63/0.90 % Terminating...
% 2.17/1.00 % Runner terminated.
% 2.17/1.00 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------