TSTP Solution File: ALG382-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : ALG382-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:13:13 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 2 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(v_aa____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c____,v_cs____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_z____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_real__mult__1_0,axiom,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_real__mult__1_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(v_aa____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c____,v_cs____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_z____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(v_aa____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c____,v_cs____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_z____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(v_aa____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c____,v_cs____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_z____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_HOL_Otimes__class_Otimes(c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1,tc_RealDef_Oreal) = X1,
cls_real__mult__1_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oplus__class_Oplus(v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(v_aa____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(c_Polynomial_Opoly(c_Polynomial_OpCons(v_c____,v_cs____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_z____,tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_Complex_Ocomplex),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : ALG382-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat May 18 23:39:23 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.51 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 31836 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 0.19/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.51 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.51 # Scheduled 11 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 110s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 110s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with 110s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 110s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with pid 31843 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 0.19/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.51 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.51 # Scheduled 11 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 110s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 110s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with 110s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 110s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.51 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 992
% 0.19/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Initial clauses : 992
% 0.19/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 992
% 0.19/0.51 # Processed clauses : 115
% 0.19/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.19/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 114
% 0.19/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.19/0.51 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.19/0.51 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 112
% 0.19/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 104
% 0.19/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 877
% 0.19/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 2733
% 0.19/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7
% 0.19/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.19/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.19/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.19/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.19/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.19/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 29094
% 0.19/0.51 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2010
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.19/0.51 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.51 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.19/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 3708 pages
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 # User time : 0.058 s
% 0.19/0.51 # System time : 0.014 s
% 0.19/0.51 # Total time : 0.072 s
% 0.19/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 2384 pages
% 0.19/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------