TSTP Solution File: ALG369-1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : ALG369-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 18:21:19 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.78s
% Output   : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (  10   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   2   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f651,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f650,f566]) ).

fof(f566,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_e,v_m____),c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(v_e,v_m____,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_2) ).

fof(f650,plain,
    ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_e,v_m____),c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(v_e,v_m____,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f649,f567]) ).

fof(f567,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_e,v_m____),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_1) ).

fof(f649,plain,
    ( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_e,v_m____),c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_e,v_m____),c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(v_e,v_m____,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f568,f627]) ).

fof(f627,plain,
    ! [X6] :
      ( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X6,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
      | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X6,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal)
      | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X6,c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(v_e,v_m____,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f515,f569]) ).

fof(f569,axiom,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f515,axiom,
    ! [X6] :
      ( ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X6,tc_RealDef_Oreal)
      | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X6,c_HOL_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal)
      | ~ c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(X6,c_HOL_Oinverse__class_Odivide(v_e,v_m____,tc_RealDef_Oreal),tc_RealDef_Oreal)
      | v_thesis____ ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_that_0) ).

fof(f568,axiom,
    c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(c_HOL_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_e,v_m____),tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : ALG369-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 23:16:38 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.36  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.16/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.77  % (27214)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27217)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27218)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27216)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27219)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27215)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27220)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27221)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27214)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (27214)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77  % (27214)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27214)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.60/0.77  
% 0.60/0.77  % (27214)Memory used [KB]: 1426
% 0.60/0.77  % (27214)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.60/0.77  % (27214)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27217)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (27217)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77  % (27217)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27217)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.60/0.77  
% 0.60/0.77  % (27217)Memory used [KB]: 1410
% 0.60/0.77  % (27217)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.60/0.77  % (27217)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27214)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77  % (27214)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77  % (27217)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77  % (27217)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77  % (27221)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (27221)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77  % (27221)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27221)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.60/0.77  
% 0.60/0.77  % (27221)Memory used [KB]: 1417
% 0.60/0.77  % (27221)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.60/0.77  % (27221)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27221)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77  % (27221)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77  % (27219)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (27219)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77  % (27219)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27219)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.60/0.77  
% 0.60/0.77  % (27219)Memory used [KB]: 1412
% 0.60/0.77  % (27219)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.60/0.77  % (27219)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27219)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77  % (27219)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77  % (27222)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/55Mi)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27223)dis+3_25:4_sil=16000:sos=all:erd=off:i=50:s2at=4.0:bd=off:nm=60:sup=off:cond=on:av=off:ins=2:nwc=10.0:etr=on:to=lpo:s2agt=20:fd=off:bsr=unit_only:slsq=on:slsqr=28,19:awrs=converge:awrsf=500:tgt=ground:bs=unit_only_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/50Mi)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27216)First to succeed.
% 0.60/0.77  % (27216)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-27204"
% 0.60/0.77  % (27225)lrs-1011_1:1_sil=4000:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:sp=frequency:plsql=on:nwc=10.0:i=52:aac=none:afr=on:ss=axioms:er=filter:sgt=16:rawr=on:etr=on:lma=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/52Mi)
% 0.60/0.77  % (27220)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (27220)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77  % (27220)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.78  % (27216)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.78  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.78  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.78  % (27216)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (27216)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.78  % (27216)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.78  
% 0.60/0.78  % (27216)Memory used [KB]: 1450
% 0.60/0.78  % (27216)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.60/0.78  % (27216)Instructions burned: 13 (million)
% 0.60/0.78  % (27204)Success in time 0.406 s
% 0.60/0.78  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------